 |
 |
 |

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
IWPR: UZBEKS RE-ENGAGE WITH NATO

Uzbekistan’s rapprochement with NATO marks a new commitment to cooperating with the West on security matters, but NBCentralAsia analysts say this does not run counter to Tashkent’s membership of a defence grouping of former Soviet states.
President Islam Karimov attended the NATO summit in Bucharest on April 2-4, and offered pact members the use of Uzbek territory as an overland route for supplying non-military material to Afghanistan.
The Uzbeks have attended past NATO summits - in 2002 and 2004 – but the relationship soured when Tashkent refused to accept western demands for an independent investigation into the Andijan violence of May 2005.
The Uzbek authorities ordered the closure of the United States military airbase in Khanabad and forbade the use of their airspace for military flights to Afghanistan.
As ties with NATO deteriorated, Tashkent turned towards the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, CSTO, a defence grouping of ex-Soviet states which it had hitherto viewed with some suspicion.
Karimov felt pact members did not back him up sufficiently when militants of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan staged armed incursions in 1999-2000. The CSTO was “of no benefit”, he said, and he declared a moratorium on his country’s participation in the bloc.
Uzbek membership of the CSTO was revived in July 2006, and the upper house of parliament formalised full membership at the end of March 2008.
The other CSTO members are Russia, three Central Asian states - Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan – plus Armenia and Belorussia.
Observers see a period of détente emerging in Tashkent’s foreign relations, and point out that this is Karimov’s first visit to Europe since Andijan
Events like the NATO meeting are important to Uzbekistan in terms of investment, technological development and security assistance, they say.
“Resuming contacts that have been frozen is to be welcomed, as it is in our national and strategic interests to cooperate with the North Atlantic alliance and with the West in general,” said Farhad Tolipov, a political analyst in Tashkent.
Uzbekistan’s proximity to Afghanistan gives it a particular interest in working towards stability for this war-torn country. Analysts say that right now, NATO is the only force in a position to cope with the tough job of combating the Taleban insurgency.
Orozbek Moldaliev, who heads the Politics, Religion and Security Centre, a regional think-tank based in Bishkek, argues that Karimov is increasingly being pushed towards the West because he needs assistance in the security and other sectors, and CSTO membership actually offers him little of any practical value.
For instance, he said, “The CSTO cannot arrange sales of weaponry at preferential prices. The former Soviet republics remain member of the grouping merely through inertia, as they can’t see any alternative to it. But there are things [other options] to consider.”
Other commentators see no contradiction between the Uzbeks remaining CSTO members while opening up to NATO. This multi-vector strategy fits well with what observers see as growing contacts between NATO and the CSTO.
Tolipov recently attended a CSTO conference in Moscow, and reports that a committee of experts is already discussing “the hypothetical possibility of future cooperation” with NATO on crisis situations and peacemaking operations.
Tashkent’s engagement with both these military and political blocs can only strengthen its position, he argues.
“The Uzbek-NATO vector of relations will serve as a kind of signal, and as a contribution to this general trend towards a rapprochement between NATO and CSTO,” said Tolipov.
(NBCentralAsia is an IWPR-funded project to create a multilingual news analysis and comment service for Central Asia, drawing on the expertise of a broad range of political observers across the region. The project ran from August 2006 to September 2007, covering all five regional states. With new funding, the service is resuming, covering only Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan for the moment).
Institute for War and Peace Reporting, April 4, 2008
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest
28.04.2008
|
UZBEKISTAN TODAY: IMPORTANT PARTNER IN CENTRAL ASIAN REGION
|
During their face-to-face talks Islam Karimov and Nursultan Nazarbayev shared their views on the current state and prospects of mutual relations and discussed the international and regional problems of mutual interest.
|
31.03.2008
|
WORLD SECURITY NETWORK: TOWARDS A GRAND STRATEGY FOR AN UNCERTAIN WORLD – RENEWING THE TRANSATLANTIC PARTNERSHIP
|
At the upcoming NATO summit in Bucharest from April 2 - 4, 2008 the quest for a new comprehensive NATO "Grand Strategty" will be one of the most sensitive issues.
|
13.11.2007
|
RFE/RL: UN PANEL SEEKS ANSWERS ON UZBEK TORTURE RECORD
|
Has Tashkent moved to improve its record on torture, despite its well-documented history of abuse? Later this month, the UN panel is due to issue an official report based on the talks with foreign and Uzbek rights activists and officials.
|
|
Expert forum
VISIT OF PRESIDENT OF UZBEKISTAN ISLOM KARIMOV TO KAZAKHSTAN
|
GULNUR RAKHMATULINA
|
06.05.2008
|
On April 22-23, 2008 President of Uzbekistan Islom Karimov was on an official visit to Kazakhstan, which is of great importance to the development of the mutually beneficial cooperation of the two countries.
|
RUSSIA AND UZBEKISTAN ENHANCE ALLIED RELATIONS
|
FARID МUKHAMETSHIN
|
25.04.2008
|
In recent years the relations between Russia and Uzbekistan have reached a high level and have followed a sustainable bilateral development pattern in almost all areas.
|
DOES NATO ENLARGEMENT POSE A THREAT TO RUSSIA?
|
KONSTANTIN ZATULIN, ALEXANDER KONOVALOV, TATYANA PARKHALINA, OLES DONIY, LEONID KOZHARA, IVAN ZAETS, ANDREW KUCHINS
|
07.04.2008
|
"Why do the Central and Eastern European countries seek to join NATO? For many of them it is a way to join the EU. Many countries took this as institutionalization of independence from Moscow. For many countries it was a way to return to Europe," Tatyana Parkhalina.
|
NATO, THE CIS AND RUSSIA AFTER BUCHAREST
|
STEPHEN BLANK
|
02.04.2008
|
In advance of NATO’s Bucharest summit Russia has decided to employ the traditional Soviet tactics of intimidation and blackmail to block NATO’s enlargement.
|
NATO-RUSSIA BREAK: A SIGNIFICANT POSSIBILITY
|
GEORGETA POURCHOT
|
01.04.2008
|
The Bucharest NATO summit offers a significant possibility that NATO’s and Russia’s positions on a variety of issues will further diverge, marking the beginning of the end of this uneven relationship.
|
EURASIA RISING: DEMOCRACY AND INDEPENDENCE IN THE POST-SOVIET SPACE
|
GEORGETA POURCHOT
|
14.03.2008
|
Eurasian Home website with a kind permission of the Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., publishes the first chapter "Sovereignity from Within" of the book "Eurasia Rising: Democracy and Independence in the Post-Soviet Space" by the Eurasian Home website contributor Georgeta Pourchot.
|
AS EXPECTED, UZBEKISTAN’S KARIMOV WON RE-ELECTION
|
ABDUMANNOB POLAT
|
25.12.2007
|
As long as Karimov keeps his iron fist upon political system and government, he is most likely to stay in power. However, nobody knows for how long he will stay healthy and strong enough (physically and politically) to control Uzbekistan and his own team. He clearly needs to prepare succession scenarios.
|
NEW BIG GAME IN CENTRAL ASIA
|
ANDREY GROZIN
|
14.11.2007
|
At present the West has better attitude towards Turkmenistan than it did under former President Saparmurat Niyazov, although since he died, the regime has hardly changed. This shows once more that oil and gas are more important than democracy.
|
NOT TO LOSE CENTRAL ASIA
|
ELENA YATSENKO
|
07.09.2007
|
The Central Asian states are becoming agents of world politics and can act pursuant to their own interests. Russia can be one of the parties solving the region’s problems. Our proposals must be diverse and competitive. If we lose the competition, Russia will have to conform to the other actors’ rules.
|
NATO AND RUSSIA’S BALANCING ACT
|
GEORGETA POURCHOT
|
02.05.2006
|
NATO’s most recent informal summit in Sophia underscores a decade and a half of balancing act between two former adversaries, the North Atlantic Alliance and Russia.
|
Analysis
15.11.2007
|
BLOODY CONFLICT IN ANDIJAN: 12-13 MAY, 2005
|
Eurasian Home publishes the article “Bloody conflict in Andijan: 12-13 May, 2005” by Abdumannob Polat. This article is a revised version of the part of the author’s report made for The Jamestown Foundation.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|