|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“THE REVOLUTION IN KYRGYZSTAN WAS BOTH UNEXPECTED AND PREDICTABLE”
PETER RUTLAND,
Professor at Wesleyan University and an associate of the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University
Alisher Khamidov shows an impressive grasp of the internal dynamics of Kyrgyzstan that led up to the violent events of this week. While there has been some speculation about the role of international actors in provoking the crisis, Khamidov is surely correct in focusing on the domestic causes of the unrest, rooted in economic stagnation and political corruption. Although he correctly notes some differences between the 2005 Tulip Revolution and the present, for this outsider, the similarities outweigh the differences.
The revolution was both unexpected and predictable. The revolution was predictable in the sense that the mis-steps of the Bakiev government were plain for all to see. Still, the toppling of his regime was unexpected, because such events are quite rare. In the former Soviet Union, the most recent example would be the unrest that occurred in Moldova after the disputed election in April 2009. The fact that Kyrgyzstan experienced one such revolution in 2005 makes it more likely that such action can be repeated - if it happened once, then it can happen again. But this also means that President Bakiev, knowing precisely what could happen, should have been able to take steps to head off the second revolution that removed him from power. Yet it looks like he decided to launch a crackdown, arresting opposition leaders, without having taken steps to ensure that the security forces were united in their willingness to use ruthless force to maintain order.
The bloody and chaotic overthrow of the Bakiev regime is not good news for anybody. For Western liberals, it merely highlights the sorry conditions in Kyrgyzstan, the one country in Central Asia that had tried to follow Western advice about the benefits of democratization, market reform and free trade. For Kyrgyzstan's authoritarian neighbors, it must be worrying to see that an incumbent ruler can lose control of the streets so quickly. For they too face the very same challenges of corruption, unemployment and price increases that brought down Bakiev.
April 9, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our readers’ comments
Sally |
15.04.2010 14:37 |
I agree that this revolution was unexpected and unpredictable. Nobody knew that this will happen. It happened so quickly...
I agree that this revolution was unexpected and unpredictable. Nobody knew that this will happen. It happened so quickly! Bakiev is a terrible despod! how could he defenseless people??!!!! it is terrible!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Send a comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest
20.04.2010
|
EURASIA DAILY MONITOR: NAZARBAYEV’S ROLE IN THE KYRGYZ CRISIS
|
Kazakhstan, currently chairing the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), by extricating the former Kyrgyz President, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, from internal exile in Jalalabad has highlighted opaque features of the crisis.
|
08.04.2010
|
RFE/RL: KYRGYZ OPPOSITION CLAIMS POWER, VOWS TO INVESTIGATE BAKIEV'S RULE
|
Kyrgyzstan's opposition says it has taken control of the government and dissolved parliament after a day of violent unrest that left at least 68 people dead and hundreds more wounded.
|
06.04.2010
|
EURASIANET.ORG: IS PUTIN PUNISHING BAKIYEV?
|
As President Kurmanbek Bakiyev confronts a political crisis in Kyrgyzstan, he is not getting any help from Moscow. If anything, the Kremlin appears intent on turning up the heat on the embattled Kyrgyz leader.
|
04.08.2009
|
EURASIA DAILY MONITOR: CSTO IN CRISIS AS MOSCOW SECURES SECOND MILITARY BASE IN KYRGYZSTAN
|
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and his Kyrgyz counterpart Kurmanbek Bakiyev, exchange the signed copies of a joint memorandum on Russia's new base in Kyrgyzstan during their meeting at Cholpon-Ata.
|
28.07.2009
|
EURASIA DAILY MONITOR: RUSSIA PROMOTES ITS "SPHERE OF PRIVILEGED INTERESTS" IN KYRGYZSTAN
|
Speculation has recently mounted that Bishkek will agree to a request from Moscow to open a new Russian military base in southern Kyrgyzstan.
|
28.01.2009
|
INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: KYRGYZSTAN - USA: DO WE NEED EACH OTHER?
|
The interests of Kyrgyzstan and, accordingly, its policy with respect to the U.S. during the years of independence have not gone beyond the corridor of commercial preferences.
|
|
Expert forum
ANOTHER TULIP REVOLUTION IN KYRGYZSTAN?
|
ALISHER KHAMIDOV
|
07.04.2010
|
The developments in Kyrgyzstan are claiming much of our attention. We're still receiving controversial reports and updates from Kyrgyzstan. Many of us are grappling with similar questions: What's happening in Kyrgyzstan? Are we talking about another Tulip revolution? How are the current protests similar or different from the Tulip revolution? So what are broader patterns here?
|
CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN KYRGYZSTAN
|
DENIS KIM
|
08.02.2010
|
In December 2009, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, President of Kyrgyzstan, launched the constitutional reform. The official reason is the constitutional amendments are needed to define the powers of the President, the Parliament and the Cabinet, considering the administrative reform in Kyrgyzstan.
|
KURMANBEK BAKIYEV’S ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
|
DENIS KIM
|
27.10.2009
|
All the main political and economic resources will be concentrated in Kurmanbek Bakiyev's hands. Strengthening of the presidential power in the republic can be regarded as a result of Kurmanbek Bakiyev’s winning the July 2009 presidential election by a landslide.
|
KURMANBEK BAKIYEV PROMISES TO REFORM KYRGYZSTAN
|
AZAMAT TEMIRKULOV
|
09.09.2009
|
President Bakiyev’s decision is reasonable. This is not a redistribution of powers between the Parliament and the President or between the President and the Cabinet in favor of Kurmanbek Bakiyev.
|
|
Opinion
KYRGYZ SYNDROME
|
Aleh Novikau |
20.04.2010
|
The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|