Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


ZERKALO NEDELI: EARLY ELECTION IN UKRAINE - DANGEROUS EXPERIMENT

Print version

This article does not assess the behavior of major Ukrainian political forces and their leaders as much has been and will be written about that. My point is that these all-versus-all political games obscure important economic problems which tend to aggravate underlying conditions of political instability.

The preterm parliamentary election [slated for December 7, 2008] is a dangerous experiment fraught with serious economic consequences. Every preterm election is a defeat of economic logic by the force majeure of political expediency.

Firstly, the previous preterm parliamentary election in 2007 took place when the global environment was quite favorable for Ukraine and when the national economy was growing steadily (even though inflation was growing too). It was when many experts, including the author, said that the Ukrainian economy was becoming less susceptible to political shocks. The 2008 election was announced during a global financial crisis which inevitably leads to economic recess. Nobody can say how deep or how long this crisis will be, but it is already evident that Ukraine has been hit by the first wave of this crisis: external financial resources are getting more expensive; foreign investors are in no hurry to confront growing risks and a number of investment projects are being curtailed; the national stock market is “sagging,” with auctions being suspended more and more often.

The second wave – global recess – is approaching: it means lower demand for Ukrainian exports and higher competition for solvent consumers on world markets. On top of that there are Ukraine’s latent economic problems that tend to aggravate.

How can Ukraine respond to sudden shocks if its government is in the balance, its president has no economic instruments a priori, its parliament is out to polls, and the only legitimate body is the central bank?

Secondly, since 2004 there have been no structural and institutional reforms in the country. For all this time Ukraine has been demonstrating a strange phenomenon of “growth without reform,” but the potential of such growth has been practically exhausted. Now, even though economic development continues under its own inertia, the country is accumulating lag. Due to the absence of reforms Ukraine is lagging behind other countries as a competitor. Remarks like “they are so strong and smart but are in deep water too” are irrelevant.

Of course, Ukraine is not strong enough to reverse global economic trends, but a reformed economy has more capacity for cushioning negative external impacts and for post-crisis restoration. Instead, frequent elections leave no place for strategic reforms.

Thirdly, an unreformed system needs more and more money to keep functioning. The most evident example is the system of social security: expenditures are growing but the principles remain the same. So does the quality of service. The longer reforms are delayed, the more they will cost.

This concerns Ukraine’s infrastructure as a whole. It proves over and over again that leaps and bounds do not work and that political instability is especially detrimental to long-term infrastructural projects (including the Euro-2012) and partnership between authorities and private business.

Fourthly, Ukraine is part of the globalized world, but being in a state of permanent political uncertainty it has nothing to offer its partners but lip service and even provokes some of them to exert direct economic and political influence over it.

It is more than dangerous to use the gas issue as a campaigning tool now that the gas price talks with Russia are complicated by the global financial crisis.

Fifthly, yet another preterm parliamentary election in this country demonstrates the utter degree of personalization of Ukrainian politics. Under such circumstances it is impossible to look for constructive solutions because any judgments are immediately referred and tied to individual persons. Any problem boils down then to the question of who plays for whom or against whom. Yet, the people need to see a definite course, albeit personalized.

This election campaign reduces the people’s trust in authorities, the economic agents’ trust in the rules set by authorities, etc. Without such trust it is impossible to consolidate society and carry out unpopular reforms. And it is trust that “leads to prosperity,” as Francis Fukuyama convincingly proved.

People trust only a strong state – i.e. authorities that are able to consistently meet and protect their interests irrespective of the government’s or parliament’s composition.

Sixthly, this election is most likely to victimize the 2009 national budget: the lawmakers simply have no time to consider and adopt the budget bill. When adopted during an election race, it can hardly be perfect, but its absence is not a good sign to economic agents in or beyond the country under conditions of economic and political uncertainty.

Seventhly, elections cost a lot of money, mostly cash. As the amount of liquid assets is reducing, such a “volley” emission of cash may enhance fluctuations of prices and currency exchange rates.

Eighthly, a period of economic and political instability is the best time for speculators on the currency and other markets, raiders, and shady deals. Besides, politicians get off easily by blaming economic problems caused by their mistakes on elections.

And finally, there is a question: how should the prime minister (regardless of different attitudes toward her) feel in this state of permanent political uncertainty, even if she is earnestly resolved to carry out reforms? Since the Orange Revolution, not a single Ukrainian government has stayed in office for more than a year. This is one of the objective reasons for their populist policy. Laws demand that the government increase spending on a host of social programs while economic logic demands the opposite. The head of government always remains a hostage to the unreformed economy and political uncertainty. There is one more question: even if this government does launch reforms, will it follow through?

The conclusion is not very original: numerous external and internal challenges demand political consolidation but not political uncertainty. The political leaders who succeed in such consolidation will be thanked and remembered. And this preterm election is a dangerous political experiment.

Igor BURAKOVSKY

“Zerkalo Nedeli”, Ukraine’s International Social Political Weekly, № 38 (717), 11-17 October 2008




Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

06.10.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: GAS CUSHION

On 2 October 2008, thanks to long preparatory work, negotiations between Russian and Ukrainian prime ministers, Yuliya Tymoshenko and Vladimir Putin took place after all, and were fairly successful.

04.10.2008

GALLUP.COM: UKRAINIANS MAY OPPOSE PRESIDENT’S PRO-WESTERN GOALS

A Gallup Poll found a strong majority of Ukrainians (65%) saying their leadership is taking the country in the wrong direction and only about one in six (16%) expressing confidence in their national government.

26.09.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: THE BEES AND THE BONNET

Yulia Tymoshenko and Viktor Yanukovych do deserve a good deal of criticism, but Viktor Yushchenko bears the heaviest brunt of responsibility as the guarantor of the Constitution and the “arbiter of the nation.”

22.09.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: THERE WAS A WISE MAN OF…
Yet another preterm parliamentary election is looming on the horizon while politicians are still unable to choose their course. A new coalition (whatever its configuration) ought to crown their efforts.

15.09.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: FIELD REPORTS

This week all those involved in the current stage of the permanent Ukrainian political crisis played a kind of make-believe game. Inside Ukraine the President made believe a coup d’etat and in Europe he made believe “a normal democratic process.”

08.09.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: GOING ALL THE WAY?

Strangely enough, the long-awaited political event that happened last week came as a bolt from the blue, especially to those who had been working the hardest for it. The scared leaders put up a brave front, trying to make everyone believe that it was all in their plans.

01.09.2008

ZERKALO NEDELI: WAR TOMORROW?

This year the question of Ukraine’s ability to adequately respond to internal and external challenges arose in a new aspect. The events in South Ossetia posed a new question: is Ukraine able to defend itself if confronted with a military threat?


Expert forum
UKRAINE IS FORCED TO CHOOSE UNSTABILITY

STANISLAV PRITCHIN

14.10.2008

On October 8, in his message to the people President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko announced the dissolution of the Verkhovna Rada. His speech was based on the allegation that Yuliya Tymoshenko and her decisions “threaten Ukraine”.


THE BREAKUP OF THE 'ORANGE' COALITION

VITALY BALA

17.09.2008

The main reason for the breakup of the 'orange' coalition is that President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko does not want to accept Yuliya Tymoshenko's wide popularity in Ukraine.


THE FUTURE OF VIKTOR YUSHCHENKO AND POLITICAL CRISIS IN UKRAINE

VADIM KARASYOV, VITALY PORTNIKOV

16.09.2008

"Currently there are a few people in Ukraine backing Viktor Yushchenko’s nation building and cultural project, and if the early elections were called  the votes could be distributed, in the main, between the Party of Regions and Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc," Vitaly Portnikov said.


CELEBRATION OF THE 1,020 ANNIVERSARY OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY KYIVAN RUS

VADIM KARASYOV

04.08.2008

We should not discuss the theology issues and the relations within the Orthodox Church. We should discuss the celebration of the 1,020th anniversary of the acceptance of Christianity by Rus where there was a complicated political intrigue.


“SEA BREEZE-2008” AND PROSPECTS OF UKRAINE’S JOINING NATO

VITALY PORTNIKOV

22.07.2008

The holding of “Sea Breeze” military exercises and Ukraine’s joining NATO should be regarded as two different processes. Some people want to unite them, but Kyiv has not applied for the NATO membership yet. Ukraine has not received the NATO Membership Action Plan and, apparently, will not recieve it in December.


UKRAINE: SUMMING UP THE POLITICAL SEASON

VADIM KARASYOV

18.07.2008

The winter-spring political season in Ukraine was determined by two peculiarities. Firstly, this is the influence of the 2007 early parliamentary elections on many events in the country in 2008. The second peculiarity is a more complicated and fundamental problem of institutionalization of the Parliament in the context of the constitutional changes.



Opinion
ELECTIONS IN LIEU OF STABILITY
John Marone

09.10.2008

Ukraine is going to hold its fifth general elections in as many years, but don't expect the upcoming parliamentary vote to stabilize the country's chaotic political arena any time soon. Ever since President Viktor Yushchenko was elected on a pro-Western platform back in 2005, the seats of power in the former Soviet republic have been contested in a no-holds-barred dogfight that is desperate to the point of absurdity. 


THE EUROPEAN SUBCONTINENT
Ivan Gayvanovych

01.10.2008

In Transcarpathia, near the Ukrainian village of Delovoe, there are three geodetic signs indicating the geographic center of the European subcontinent. The first sign was put up in 1887 under Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria. The second one was set up by the members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. The third one was put up in the first years of Ukraine’s independence after the Soviet Union had collapsed.


ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Jules Evans

27.08.2008

The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.


TRUE COLORS - UKRAINE'S REACTION TO CONFLICT IN SOUTH OSSETIA
John Marone

18.08.2008

By sending troops into Georgia earlier this month, the Kremlin has shown its willingness to use force to check the advance of the West into what it considers Russia's zone of influence. The pretext for the invasion, Georgia's military clampdown on its separatist region of South Ossetia, is irrelevant.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation