Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


RFE/RL: RUSSIA PROPOSES HOSTING KARABAKH SUMMIT

Print version

The brief August war between Georgia and Russia served to highlight the destabilizing potential of unresolved conflicts in the Caucasus and thus lent a new urgency to ongoing efforts to find a solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Speaking on October 21 during a visit to Yerevan, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev argued that one of the lessons to be drawn from the fighting over South Ossetia is that such conflicts can and must be resolved peacefully, through negotiations.

To that end, Medvedev offered to host a summit in Moscow early next month between Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian and his newly reelected Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev in order to seek a solution to the Karabakh conflict "based on international principles."

Basic Principles

The September visit to Yerevan by Turkish President Abdullah Gul fuelled hopes for a normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia that could in turn facilitate an accord on Karabakh. At the same time, some analysts construed Gul's statement that Ankara is ready to help mediate such a solution as a bid, possibly supported by Russia, to sideline the OSCE's Minsk Group. And some political figures in Yerevan fear that under pressure from both Russia and the West, Sarkisian might agree to compromises they consider unacceptable and detrimental to Armenia's long-term interests.

A framework agreement for resolving the Karabakh conflict already exists, in the form of the so-called Madrid Principles presented by the French, U.S., and Russian Minsk Group co-chairmen to the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Madrid in November 2007. That blueprint in turn was based on the so-called Basic Principles for the Peaceful Solution of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, which were made public in June 2006.

The Basic Principles envisage the phased withdrawal of Armenian forces from Azerbaijani territories contiguous to Nagorno-Karabakh, including the district of Kelbacar and the strategic Lachin corridor that links Armenia and the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR); the demilitarization of those previously occupied territories; the deployment of an international peacekeeping force; demining, reconstruction, and other measures to address the impact of the conflict and expedite the return to their homes of displaced persons; and, finally, a referendum among the NKR population to determine the region's future status vis-a-vis the central Azerbaijani government in Baku.

Meeting for the first time on the sidelines of a CIS summit in St. Petersburg in June, Sarkisian and Aliyev gave the green light for their respective foreign ministers to continue talks on ways to resolve the conflict on the basis of the Madrid Principles. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who traveled to Yerevan in early October for talks with Sarkisian and Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian, was quoted by "Rossiiskaya gazeta" on October 7 as saying that all three co-chairs see "a very real chance" of resolving the conflict, assuming that agreement can be reached on the "two or three" still unresolved issues.

Lavrov added that the main obstacle is lack of consensus on the future of the Lachin corridor. The Azerbaijani website day.az back on April 1 quoted Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov as saying Azerbaijan has no objections to both Armenia and Azerbaijan using the corridor, provided it remains territorially a part of Azerbaijan.

Resolution Hopes

Visiting Yerevan on October 17, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Fried was even more upbeat than Lavrov. He told RFE/RL's Armenian Service that a breakthrough in the conflict-resolution process in the coming weeks is "possible," given that "the war in Georgia reminded everyone in this region how terrible war is" and thus made a resumption of hostilities less likely. But, Fried went on, "possible does not mean inevitable, and there are hard decisions that have to be made on both sides. If this conflict were easy to resolve, it would have been resolved already."

Fried did not mention any heightened role for Turkey in the peace process. But meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian (no relation to Serzh) in Washington on October 14, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice discounted speculation that the Minsk Group would be superseded as the mediating body.

Speaking to journalists in Yerevan on September 17, French Minsk Group co-Chairman Bernard Fassier similarly sought to dispel the perception that Turkey was seeking to torpedo the work of the Minsk Group. Fassier explained that since Turkey is one of the 12 members of the OSCE Minsk Group, "its efforts directed at providing assistance to the settlement of the Karabakh conflict do not imply a change in the format of negotiations." He said that Turkey "has always shown a constructive approach, supporting the activities of the three co-chairmen," and that "any proposal made to support the negotiations, in particular from Turkey, is desirable and welcome," RFE/RL's Armenian Service reported.

Former Armenian President Levon Ter-Petrossian nonetheless argued at a rally of his supporters in Yerevan on October 17 that the West is trying to squeeze Russia out of the Karabakh peace process as part of a broader effort to minimize Russian influence in the South Caucasus, RFE/RL's Armenian Service reported.

Ter-Petrossian accused President Sarkisian (after whom, according to official returns, he polled second in the February 19 presidential ballot) of being ready to "put Karabakh up for sale" and renounce Armenia's long-standing political and military alliance with Russia in an effort to legitimize his rule in the eyes of the international community. By doing so, Ter-Petrossian continued, Sarkisian is in effect entrusting the West in general, and Turkey in particular, with achieving a "unilateral settlement" of the Karabakh conflict.

Even the Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaktsutiun (HHD), a member of the four-party coalition government, is uneasy at the prospect that, under pressure from the international community, President Sarkisian might make unacceptable concessions over Karabakh. HHD parliament faction secretary Artashes Shahbazian told journalists in Yerevan on October 13 that his party, and Armenian society as a whole, opposes the return to Azerbaijan of the districts currently under the control of Armenian forces, Noyan Tapan reported.

Asked on October 20 why the HHD remains in government if it rejects President Sarkisian's Karabakh policy, senior HHD member Kiro Manoyan explained that "it is the chance to convince our partners and influence them that keeps us in the coalition," Noyan Tapan reported. Manoyan added that if the HHD concludes that it no longer wields any influence, it will quit the coalition.

Liz Fuller

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, October 22, 2008




Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

10.03.2008

IWPR: MUTUAL RECRIMINATIONS AFTER KARABAKH CLASH

As the dust begins to settle from a firefight between Azerbaijan and Armenian forces, their respective politicians have reverted to verbal warfare as international mediators work to contain the damage to longer term prospects for peace.

04.02.2008

IWPR: FORMER ARMENIAN PRESIDENT EMERGES AS CONTENDER

Ter-Petrosian does not have the backing of the entire opposition, he has won the support of a number of parties. As well as his own Armenian National Movement, he has secured the backing of Stepan Demirchian of the People’s Party.


Expert forum
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN AZERBAIJAN

ALEXANDER ISKANDARYAN

20.10.2008

The presidential election in Azerbaijan is of little interest in terms of influence on the political situation in the country and in the South Caucasus as a whole. The election returns are quite predictable, incumbent President Ilham Aliyev has no serious rivals and his easy victory was assured. 


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN AZERBAIJAN. DO WE FACE THE REVISION OF THE RUSSO-AZERBAIJANI RELATIONS IN THE XXI CENTURY?

SOYUN SADYKOV

10.10.2008

I believe that the October 15, 2008 Azerbaijani presidential elections will be held calmly. There is no alternative to incumbent President Ilham Aliyev. The opposition failed to enlist the people’s support.


DOES THE CIS HAVE THE FUTURE?

ALEXEY VLASOV, SERGEI MIKHEEV

09.10.2008

"Every year somebody says that the Commonwealth of Independent States is dead as organization. However, what do we need this organization for? Unfortunately, in many respects the question cannot be answered in an optimistic way", Alexey Vlasov.


ARMENIA VOICED ITS POSITION TO THE KREMLIN

KIRILL GAVRILOV

09.09.2008

At present, Russia tries to persuade its closest allies to follow Moscow’s example and to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia’s independence. Armenia could be the first CIS country to support Moscow's decision.


RUSSIAN-AZERBAIJANI RELATIONS: NEW STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT

ALEXEY MALASHENKO, ALEXEY VLASOV, RASIM MUSABEKOV, RASHAD RZAQULIYEV

19.05.2008

"We should view the Russian-Azerbaijani relations in the context of shaping the Eurasian policy. It is Russia that plays a certain role in the formation of a new fair order in Eurasia", Rashad Rzaquliyev.


THE CASPIAN SEA STATUS AND THE NABUCCO PROJECT: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN AZERBAIJAN AND TURKMENISTAN

ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV

05.05.2008

On April 22, a regular meeting of the representatives of the Caspian countries on determination of the Caspian Sea legal status was over. The next, twenty third meeting is decided to be held in Baku.


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ARMENIA: HOW THE COUNTRY WILL DEVELOP

VYACHESLAV NIKONOV, PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSKIY MIR FOUNDATION; VARTAN TOGANYAN, GENERAL DIRECTOR OF THE EURASIAN MEDIA GROUP

15.02.2008

A fierce struggle has been waged, which becomes apparent in the street election campaigning and the press. In Armenia there are more than 300 foreign observers alone, with only about 1900 polling stations.


ROUTES FOR THE AZERBAIJANI GAS EXPORT TO EUROPE

ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV

26.11.2007

On November 17, the gas pipeline connecting the Turkish and Greek gas networks was officially inaugurated in the Turkish city of Ipsala. This gas pipeline is significant because it provides an alternative to Russia's gas pipeline system.


ARMENIA’S FOREIGN POLICY GUIDELINES

VAGAN SHRIKHANIAN

22.11.2006

After the visit of Robert Kocharian to Russia comments have appeared in Armenia that Russia appropriated the republic's telephony, that the gas pipeline from Iran to Armenia and Armenia’s railroad will also become Russia’s property.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation