Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE FUTURE OF THE UNION STATE

Print version

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH,
Editor-in-chief of “Palitychnaya Sphera” magazine, Minsk

Abolition of the preferential taxation on the Russian oil exports to Belarus should be interpreted as a part of the political game between Minsk and Moscow. It seems that the Kremlin is trying to exert pressure on the Belarusian government hoping to get benefits during bilateral negotiations.

I don’t think that Russia will stick to its guns refusing to make a compromise with Belarus. Most likely, the parties will manage to find a win-win solution. Both Vladimir Putin and Aliaksandr Lukashenka reckon on this.

Let us suppose that Russia’s pressure leads to the bilateral statement about dissolution of the Union State. But as a matter of fact, the Union State has never existed. Since 2002 the Union State bodies have not made any important decisions, they have not achieved any serious breakthroughs. All the issues have been addressed on bilateral basis with the Union State bodies proving totally invalid.

So, the official recognition of the Union State’s demise would be nothing but a mere statement of fact. But this will hardly happen in the nearest future. Firstly, despite the fact that Russia ceases to be the significant factor of the Belarusian politics, the Belarusian authorities need the Union State ideology. Secondly, in the medium term the development of the relations between the two states may require supranational bodies.

Belarusian President Aliaksandr Lukashenka, while being under Russia’s pressure, may try to draw Western investments. But one can scarcely believe that now. EU’s position towards Lukashenka is tough. Therefore, once the European companies enter the Belarusian economy, the EU will start putting pressure upon them for cooperating with the Lukashenka’s regime.

Apart from that, the European business is unlikely to invest in the Belarusian enterprises. The investment climate in the country is not stimulating for that, since the government demands too much and tends to control the economic actors.

At any event, it will be very difficult for Lukashenka to raise investments from the West.

Probably, that’s why Lukashenka is doing his best to improve relations with China, Iran and Venezuela – countries that might invest in the Belarusian economy without criticism the President’s policy.

December 14, 2006




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Expert forum
PROSPECTS FOR THE BELARUS-RUSSIA RELATIONS

OLEG MANAEV

18.12.2006

The recent visit of Belarusian President Aliaksandr Lukashenka to Russia (December 15) shows that Moscow continues with its putting pressure on him. The main objective of the Kremlin officials is to strengthen Russia’s control over Belarus and its economy.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

05.12.2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has concentrated all Belarusian diplomacy and Belarus’ foreign policy on Russia. For the last 10 years Minsk has conducted explicitly unilateral foreign policy in order to win Moscow’s favor.



Analysis

22.12.2006

BELARUS BRIEF: HOW THE WEST CONTINUES TO LOSE BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes the Belarus Brief "How the West continues to lose Belarus" on the current situation in Belarus and outlining possible scenarios for the 2007 year.



Opinion
THE BROKEN AXIS
Boris Kagarlitsky

21.12.2006

The gas ultimatum issued by Moscow to Kyiv on the eve of the New Year 2006 signaled that the Kremlin decided to use its energy resources as a weapon in the looming geopolitical conflict. Then nobody believed in Russia’s speculations about the new market pricing policy. Ukraine had turned to the West and was to be punished for that – both the Russian political commentators and ordinary people saw it that way.



Author’s opinion on other topics

NEW ROUND OF THE MINSK-MOSCOW GAS RAW

02 August 2007

It is hard for Belarus to appeal to Europe as one of the potential affected parties in the gas conflict between Minsk and Moscow. Earlier this leverage could be effective, but now it is restricted and will not be decisive for the Russian company Gazprom.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

15 May 2006

The fact, that right after the presidential elections in Belarus the Kremlin has stated that the gas prices will be raised for Minsk, is quite explainable.


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN BELARUS

17 March 2006

The official data indicate that Lukashenka is likely to get between 75 and 85% of votes in the presidential elections. However, the real support for Lukashenka is between 58 and 65%.

 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation