Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



IVAN  GAYVANOVYCH, KIEV
HIGHLY EXPLOSIVE

Print version               


First 100 days of Yuliya Tymoshenko’s premiership were crowned with the fuel crisis. After the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, guiding by a suspicion of cartel collusion among oil suppliers, set limit prices for oil products petrol stations were deprived of fuel.

President Viktor Yushchenko managed to cope with the problem of petrol deficit: he offered oil suppliers to turn over a new leaf and promised that the government would not interfere in the price regulations. As for economy, in accordance with the proverb “a blessing in disguise” the petrol crisis can have even some positive consequences: in particular, by the order of President Viktor Yushchenko the system of diversification of oil purchases will be developed (today Ukraine fully depends on Russia for that matter) and the reserves of light oil products will be created.

However, the petrol crisis has had a negative effect on the current politics in Ukraine. It revealed contradictions within the new government that were more or less hidden. The problem is not only the relationships between President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yuliya Tymoshenko. The point is how the relationships will be developed between Tymoshenko who feels insulted and, for example, the First Vice Prime Minister Anatoliy Kinakh who criticizes his chief, or that is more serious the Secretary of the Council of National Security and Defence of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko who was Tymoshenko’s rival for the post of the Prime Minister. By the way, Petro Poroshenko is still willing to be a Premier.

Poroshenko took advantage of the petrol crisis to taunt Tymoshenko noting that the Cabinet is responsible for the problems arisen in the oil products market. In return, the Prime Minister made it clear that none other than Petro Poroshenko is involved in the artificial creation of the fuel crisis. (As we know, President Yushchenko placed all the responsibility on Yuliya Tymoshenko and she rejects it completely.)

Taking into account that Yuliya Tymoshenko ordered the Ukrainian Security Service to find people responsible for the crisis, the special service is expected to obtain materials that compromise Petro Poroshenko in the nearest future. By the way, the head of the Ukrainian Security Service Oleksandr Turchinov is the old close associate of Tymoshenko and her single proponent in the Government.

In this situation the President has become the gainer. Cautious and uncorrupted, Viktor Yushchenko took over the situation when the relationships between the Cabinet and the oil companies came to a standstill. He managed to recover the situation and scolded the Cabinet for the wrong actions.

However, some questions arise. Where the President was before and why he did not react when the Government made the wrong (in his opinion) decisions is unclear. It gives grounds to think that President Yushchenko would blame the Prime Ministers for all failures of the Government just as the former President Leonid Kuchma used to do. But Yuliya Tymoshenko will scarcely accept these rules.

Viktor Yushchenko still considers her party “Batkivschyna” as a blocking partner in the parliamentary elections of 2006. However, it will be difficult for Yushchenko to get the strong and ambitious Prime Minister with her independent political prospects into a joint electoral bloc. Time will tell for how long Tymoshenko will be the Prime Minister if she refuses to join the President.

The author is a News Editor with the Internet-edition “Ukrainskaya Pravda”. The article is written specially for “Eurasian Home”.

May 24, 2005



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation