Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



AKRAM  MURTAZAEV, MOSCOW
BACK TO THE USSR?

Print version               


Russia began its march to Central Asia not the day Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin celebrated his birthday, but the day the first guns had banged in the city of Andijan. Unlike the Aurora cruiser’s salvos the Andijan shots were not dry, but alike the legendary cruiser’s salvos they marked the beginning of a new era. This time it was the new era for Tashkent.

The events in Andijan have drastically restricted the range of the international contacts for Uzbekistan. As a matter of fact, there remained only two countries, China and Russia, which supported Karimov’s regime. They offered their hand to Tashkent right away after the events in Andijan. But in politics one has to pay for the timely succour. And in case of Uzbekistan this payment came to be too high.

It is dangerous for Tashkent to put its stakes on China, the latter is not to be trifled with. Moreover, this kind of relationships can harm not only Uzbekistan. That is why any move in this direction is just nonsensical. And yet, right after the Andijan events Islom Karimov went to Beijing. It was rather an ostentatious flight that vaguely resembles famous Russian Prime-Mister Primakov’s uey over the Atlantics. In such a manner Tashkent hoped to make it clear for Moscow that Russia for Uzbekistan is not the only way out of the arising international isolation. But Tashkent failed to knock down the price and now it is ready to accept virtually all the stipulations of Moscow which had tried so hard to restore its influence in Central Asia.

There is a song that is very popular in Uzbekistan. It is called “Andijan polka”. It has a very hot refrain: “I will not come to you; it will be you who comes to me”. It seems this song gives a true and fair view of the present concept of relationships between the two countries: Islom Karimov is ready to sacrifice many things, if not everything, to plead his suit with Russia. Russia is both the last love and the last hope for him.

On Putin’s birthday the President of Uzbekistan brought forth a frank confession. He said that Russia was getting more and more attractive. And all at once he made a serious proposal: “Now we see hard times and we realize more and more that we need each other. It is essential for us to become allies”. “Thank you very much. Uzbekistan’s good feelings towards Russia are mutual”, replied Putin.

The President of Russia made a point of joined efforts in the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking. “Uzbekistan is in the foreground in the fight against terrorism, and we as well do know what it means to deal with the moss-troopers trained in cross-bordered countries”, said Putin. By linking in such an ornate style Andijan and Beslan, Putin has virtually accepted Karimov’s proposal.

If we look at the political map, it strikes the eye that Russia is a long and narrow country. It is absolutely impermissible for an empire. That is why Tashkent (not Astana, Bishkek or Dushanbe) has always been Russia’s major stronghold. It assures the safety of Russia’s south frontiers. So, the signing by Uzbekistan of the Collective Security Treaty (Tashkent has avoided signing the Treaty for a long time, which made the Treaty to be a kind of defective) is now getting inevitable. And it might be the biggest diplomatic success of Russia. Beyond all doubt, now Tashkent and Moscow will easily settle the problem of Uzbek debt to Russia as well.

What needs to be emphasized is that Karimov’s geopolitical initiative was shown right on the eve of US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s tour over Central Asia, during which she visited Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan (she did not go to Uzbekistan because of Andijan events). The quick rapprochement between Russia and Uzbekistan has made the leaders of the aforementioned countries to think over the tempting offers, which they surely got from Ms. Rice, more carefully.

However, the shortcomings of the alliance between Russia and Uzbekistan are evident. First of all, the alliance is nondurable and will last as long as Moscow would be able to keep Islom Karimov’s regime. It is apparent that this way Russia will be involuntarily involved in the political processes that take place in Uzbekistan.

At any rate, judging from the amount of dirt which appears in the Russian press one can draw a conclusion that the fight for power has already begun. The member of the State Duma Committee on the CIS affairs Kanstantin Zatulin, who knows the ropes of Oriental scheming, believes that “the President of Uzbekistan should beware of internal plots not excepting those from the part of his environs”.

This remark is very precise.

Akram Murtazaev is a laureate of The Russian Journalist Award “Zolotoye Pero” ("The Golden Pen").

The article is written specially for "Eurasian Home".

October 14, 2005



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation