Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



AKRAM  MURTAZAEV, MOSCOW
PUTIN AND THE KIDS

Print version               


Nowadays Russia is savoring the President’s annual address to the Federal Assembly. It’s not that this speech had any essential significance, as no one actually remembers all the previous Putin’s addresses, but what everyone knows for sure, is that these addresses never introduced any differences to their lives. In the absence of real politics, which scooped from the public sphere to the clandestine apartments, people are just curious – what the message was that Vladimir Vladimirovich wanted to deliver.

Right before Putin’s address the voice of U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney greeted Moscow from Vilnius, whose speech in Russia was compared to that of Winston Churchill at Westminster College in Fulton in 1946, which actually indicated the beginning of the Cold War. Vladimir Putin spoke on May 10, after the Victory Day, and everybody was expecting him to decently fight off the attack. “Our President has to give “them” an answer”, declared those patriotically-spirited. And “our President” did come up with an answer.

My neighbor Petrovitch, a man of simple character and good-natured disposition, took a philosophical approach to the President’s address. “A Regime of Day and Night”, he replied briefly to the request to give comments concerning the President’s speech. And then he specified: “We will produce weapons during the daytime, and produce people for the army at night”. Though Petrovich is kind of old to contribute to the improvement of demographic situation in Russia, he was excited to learn about Putin’s “night time assignment”. 10,000 dollars promised for the second child, did give him a boost. Unlike the officials, his desire (to support President’s appeal) is at least sincere. But expecting positive results in this case is simply impolite.

To be serious, though, the birth rate problem may not be solved just by aid program. Turning the birth of the second child into a business project by furnishing a financial assistance is possible. And definitely, many people will take part in this “children making process”, having no intention to care about the future of their babies. In this case life, which is undoubtedly the superior value, becomes just a consumer product, some side dish. What will come out of them, out of these sources of income? Wouldn’t they end up just being the source of the government’s headache instead. 

Besides, Russia’s demographic problem is not only about the birth rate: the death-rate in the country is very high. The average life expectancy rate is that of an under-developed country. Every day about hundred people die of counterfeit alcohol; 35,000 people die annually in car accidents; 50,000 people quit life voluntarily – we’re quite a suicidal country. Under given living conditions, granting new lives seems unethical.

It is worth mentioning that the President’s new initiative has revived the old issue. Political analysts have noted cautiously, that such populist measures to raise the birth rate in the country look a lot like measures to raise President’s ratings. And along comes Putin’s remark that “talking about terminating the arms race is ahead of time”, and that “it is entering a technologically new level”. Russia is prepared to respond to this challenge of the West and to enter this new level, not at the expense of bringing down the life standards but by means of “intellectual superiority”.

I am sure we do have an intellectual superiority, but it’s been a long time since we last made use of it. Talent, of course, won’t go anywhere, but doubts stay. The U.S. military budget, for instance, is 25 times as big as ours, and our brain cells will have a hard time beating their “buck power”. So, this statement was also a kind of populism and made the analysts sink into thoughts about Putin’s true intentions for the year 2008. All of his statements were not those of a person, about to abandon big politics.

Soon after his address Putin made clear how serious he was about his plans. He made stunning reshuffles in the Customs Committee, FSB, General Prosecutor’s Office, and Ministry of Interior, and promised to go on with dismissals. At the same time the President dismissed people who one way or the other were connected with the siloviki clan. The bureaucratic community shuddered – their pals are being eliminated! The operation was undertaken quietly and dartingly. Everybody was given a clear account of it, definitely not being a part of the PR-action. What exactly this is – a true fight with corruption? – will become clear very soon.  

Akram Murtazaev is a laureate of The Russian Journalist Award “Zolotoye Pero” ("The Golden Pen").

May 17, 2006   



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation