Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



JOHN  MARONE, KYIV
LIES, DAMN LIES AND UKRAINE'S WTO BID

Print version               


If Ukraine's efforts to join the World Trade Organization are any indication of the country's overall commitment to economic reform, then we're all being fed a plate of lies. 

The working group monitoring Kyiv's WTO bid held an informal meeting in Geneva on October 25, followed by the usual rosy progress report issued by the Ukrainian government.    

The web site of the Cabinet of Ministers carried a statement on October 26 indicating that a breakthrough had been reached with Kyrgyzstan on the signing of an agreement on mutual access to the market of goods and services.

The tiny Central Asian republic is the last country with which Ukraine has to sign a bilateral agreement as a requirement for WTO entry.

The obstacle to achieving this has supposedly been a $25 million debt going back to Soviet times that Kyrgyzstan claims to be owed.

"Kyrgyzstan has admitted that its claims on Ukraine are unfounded and instead agreed to a zero import duty on agricultural products in exchange for signing the bilateral protocol on access to the market of goods and services," the Cabinet statement reads.

As a result, according to the government, the next, official meeting of the working group will be the last, clearing the way for final approval of Ukraine's WTO bid by a 43-nation general meeting in February.

Unfortunately, nobody told the Kyrgyz about this.

The AKIpress news agency website based in Bishkek ran a report on October 27, in which it quoted the country's Ministry of Industry, Economic Development and Trade as accusing the Ukrainian government of trying to use the media to force a WTO settlement.

"It is greatly unfortunate that Ukraine has been striving to resolve issues solely in its own favour throughout the negotiating process and in a coercive way without taking into account Kyrgyzstan's legal trade and economic interests," the Kyrgyz government statement reads.

Kyrgyzstan's ambassador to Kyiv confirmed his government's position and denied that his country had dropped its monetary claims on Ukraine.

Ukraine has been negotiating WTO entry for the past 13 years, signing one bilateral treaty after another while getting feedback in Geneva on its reform efforts.

The WTO boasts 150 member states, but only 43 have a say on Ukraine's entry, and Kyrgyzstan is one of them.

By early 2006, when the United State recognized Ukraine as a market economy and cancelled the largely symbolic Jackson-Vanik amendment, Kyiv looked like it had made it over the hump.

A year earlier, President Viktor Yushchenko had come to power with promises of greater European integration.

EU officials have made WTO membership a condition to Ukraine's obtaining a free-trade agreement.

Experts point out other benefits of WTO membership such as the promotion of efficiency and badly needed foreign investment.

However, opening the doors to international competition also poses a threat to vested Ukrainian interests, companies content with holding a monopoly over a captive consumer audience.

In addition, there is Russia, which has proposed that the two "brotherly" nations join together.

According to WTO entry rules, if Ukraine were to get in first, it could hold Russia's bid hostage to outstanding bilateral trade issues such as Russia's export tax on oil, which punishes energy-dependent Ukrainian consumers. 

Some observers have accused Russia of using its influence over the otherwise insignificant Kyrgyzstan to hold up Ukraine's WTO bid.

But this is too convenient an excuse for Kyiv. Considering all the economic benefits of WTO entry, would it really be such a burden to pay out $25 million to Bishkek?

The motivation of Ukrainian businessmen with influence if not seats in parliament to keep out foreign competition should not be underestimated. 

One need only do a quick cost comparison of what consumers are forced to pay in the Ukrainian capital for food, clothing, mobile communications, etc. in order to guess what kind of profits are at risk from a freer market.

Why improve efficiency and customer service when you can just keep out the competition by buying a seat in the legislature?

The drive to join the WTO has turned into a forced march through the mud without wheels, regardless of who is in control of the government.

Ukraine’s representative at the WTO headquarters in Geneva, Volodymyr Baluta, said his country would enter the WTO in fall 2008.

Following the approval of a final report in November, then a vote by a WTO general meeting in February, it's just a matter of a couple of months, Baluta would have us believe.

"In June 2008, Ukraine will be able to complete all preparations. And if in early fall the council ratifies the agreement on Ukraine's joining to the World Trade Organization, Ukraine will become its member in 30 days," he was quoted as saying in a government statement.

But Ukraine's parliament still has to give final approval, and lawmakers have been the main obstacles in the first place.

But you wouldn't guess this by the statements released by the government over the last year and a half.

The last official working group meeting was held on July 23, after which the Economy Ministry said everything was moving along as planned.

The same picture was drawn in May, when the parliament was said to have approved final amendments to WTO-related bill passed late last year.

The problem with such bills is that they always fall short of the working group's approval and thus have to be reworked, revoted and revisited in Geneva, while months are lost in the process.

Yushchenko first promised WTO membership in the fall of 2006, only to push the deadline back to the end of this year. 

But the president has been hard pressed to push through any of the reforms he promised during the country's much touted Orange Revolution.

And with the Orange parties winning only a slim majority in the last elections, their ability to pass much liberal bills looks equally dim until the next presidential poll in 2009.

By that time, the effects of the country's consumer spending spree and certain favorable external circumstances will have been reduced to show the economy for what it really is.

And all the lies, damn lies and WTO waffle won't be able to cover it up.

John Marone, Kyiv Post Staff Journalist, Ukraine

October 30, 2007



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

29.10.2007

ECONOMICHNA PRAVDA: ENERGY FANTASY OF UKRAINIAN BREAKTHROUGH

Those who are more or less familiar with the energy issues in Ukraine consider the ‘breakthrough’ a science fiction novel having nothing to do with reality.

05.10.2007

ECONOMICHNA PRAVDA: WHAT IS TO BE EXPECTED FROM TYMOSHENKO’S PREMIERSHIP

Tymoshenko has learned a lesson from her recent premiership and this time, of course if she manages to enter the same river twice, she will not take thoughtless steps.

25.09.2007

ZERKALO NEDELI: ECONOMICS OF PRE-ELECTION PROMISES

The ZN drew up tentative estimates of the promises given by the major candidates in the Ukrainian parliamentary race.


Expert forum
FORMATION OF THE “ORANGE” COALITION IN UKRAINE

VITALY BALA

17.10.2007

In terms of tactics, the "orange" coalition formatoin is ByuT’s victory. But as head of state,  Viktor Yushchenko is a winner, too, because he can strengthen his power through the change of the Law on Cabinet and the constitutional reform.


THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION RETURNS IN UKRAINE

STANISLAV BELKOVSKY

05.10.2007

Under Yuliya Tymoshenko, a kind of the Francoist regime could be formed in Ukraine. It could have positive and negative sides.


EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

VADIM KARASYOV

02.10.2007

The parliamentary elections results can be boiled down to three points: Viktor Yushchenko’s victory, Yuliya Tymoshenko’s double victory and Viktor Yanukovych’s defeat. Viktor Yushchenko is the winner because he had initiated the early elections and they took place. The “orange” forces stand a good chance of returning to power.


EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

DMITRY VYDRIN

01.10.2007

Yuliya Tymoshenko managed to personify Lesya Ukrainka as well as Evita Peron. So, she deserved her victory. She created a failsafe image that could only be outmatched, but everybody failed to do it.



Opinion
THE VOTES AFTER THE VOTE
John Marone

22.10.2007

Ukraine held general elections on September 30, but power sharing in the country remains to be decided in subsequent voting devoid of public participation and full of backroom intrigue. For a second time in a row, Ukraine has pulled off an internationally accepted demonstration of the people's will, with rank and file citizens putting an end to a crippling stand off between their two highest executive leaders.


WHAT COUNTS IN UKRAINE AFTER THE VOTE
John Marone

08.10.2007

With parties heir to Ukraine's Orange Revolution perched to retake full control of the country’s executive, Orange president Viktor Yushchenko is again demonstrating the kind of dubious indecision that cost them the government in the first place. His one-time revolutionary sidekick, opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko, was the real winner in the September 30 snap elections, earning enough votes to come back as premier.


TYMOSHENKO HIGH ON HER HEELS AFTER PARLIAMENTARY POLL
John Marone

01.10.2007

The queen of Ukrainian politics, opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko, was the unofficial victor in Ukraine’s snap elections on Sunday, with exit polls indicating she will head the next government. But Tymoshenko’s ascension to power will be anything but a sexy saunter, as her enemies are unlikely to allow themselves to be sidelined by a pretty populist.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation