Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



BORIS  KAGARLITSKY, MOSCOW
A PAROLE THAT WAS NOT GIVEN

Print version               


Mikhail Khodorkovsky is out of luck again. This time he was refused parole despite he had seemed to have good chances for it. The authorities made it clear that the situation could change and that there was every reason for hoping…

Being a state’s prisoner, the disgraced tycoon hoped that the new president of Russia would release him. The application for parole resembled an offer of prisoners of war exchange. But in exchange for Khodorkovsky’s discharge President Medvedev was supposed to be praised by the Western leaders and to be supported by the Russian liberals. Khodorkovsky’s discharge was a sure way to make Dmitry Medvedev look like a liberal.

New Russian President needed a good reputation indeed. When in the Kremlin it was decided to nominate Dmitry Medvedev for presidency, they sought to improve the relations with the West and to show the ‘liberal side’ of the current regime. This was immediately appreciated by some Russian liberals who were ready to admire the new leader’s slogan “Freedom is better than unfreedom” sounded discordantly to Putin’s tough rhetoric. While siloviki and nationalists, on the contrary, were frightened by that statement and possible reduction of their budgets.

Russian liberals were even ready to praise to the skies the former “bloody regime”. There was no need to change anything for it. There was a need only to supplement a couple of fine slogans uttered by the new leader with a finer gesture. For example, to discharge Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Medvedev could show a magic trick quickly turning the “bloody regime” into a democratic republic!

But the trick failed in spite of the spectators and performers’ hopes.

As ill luck would have it, the war with Georgia broke out at the wrong (or right) time. Though that war was to be nothing but a frontier conflict, nevertheless, it caused the avalanche-like process of political consequences. The U.S. Administration, which had a grudge against Russia for the hostilities in Georgia, toughened up the rhetoric towards Russia. The mass media hysteria in Washington caused the forming of a wide anti-Russian consensus between the Republicans and the Democrats. From then on, it makes no difference to the Kremlin who will become the next U.S. President. Any President will have to act sternly towards Moscow at the beginning of his term.

There is no point in flirting with the domestic liberal opposition against a background of the worsening of the relations with the USA. The oppositionists are not independent political force in Russia and they are of interest only because the Kremlin officials consider them representatives of the Western interests. If the Kremlin did not believe the liberals to be agents of foreign influence, the authorities would deal with them more disdainfully and would be harder on them. But as the foreigners are respected in Russia, the “agents of foreign influence” are esteemed to some extent.

The deterioration of the relations between Moscow and Washington makes the liberal opposition inefficient. Apparently realizing that or maybe simply being affected by their own propaganda, the liberals became really hysterical about the war in Georgia. The torrent of abuse and unsubstantiated accusations from the liberal mass media towards the Russian government can be compared only with the same muddy flow of the anti-Georgian propaganda from the Russian pro-government TV channels. However, there are significant differences here. In August the average people watched the Olympic Games rather than political programs. It is very good for emotional health of the nation that the war with Georgia took place simultaneously with the Olympic Games in Beijing: the national feelings were inoffensively expressed in the emotions of the sports fans.

The listeners to the “Ekho Moskvy” broadcasting station and the readers of liberal newspapers believe each word of their staff journalists like the Orthodox Christians believe a gospel revelation. That’s why they suffer from deep depression. Even the victories of the Russian team on the last days of the Olympic Games could not help those people to overcome it. Though, the proper Russian liberals should not support its national team. Russia’s ranking third in the Olympic Games should be regarded as an achievement of the “bloody regime” and, therefore, it can even worsen the depression.

Given the current situation, it made no sense for the Russian authorities to set Khodorkovsky free. In a period of liberal reforms Khodorkovsky’s release would be a gesture of good will, but after the armed conflict with Georgia this would be taken as a display of weakness.

The former head of Yukos will continue to be imprisoned until the Kremlin officials decide that it is time to implement liberal reforms again.

Boris Kagarlitsky is Director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements

August 28, 2008



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Expert forum
THE OUTCOME OF THE EXTRAORDINARY EU SUMMIT ON SOUTH OSSETIAN CONFLICT

VLADIMIR CHIZHOV

03.09.2008

The outcome of the extraordinary EU summit held on September 1 in Brussels was more or less predictable, both in terms of the views expressed by the EU member states and in terms of the EU Presidency conclusion.



Opinion
ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Jules Evans

27.08.2008

The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.


WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MIKHAIL KHODORKOVSKY AND JOHN TALBOT?
Boris Kagarlitsky

04.07.2008

The English military leader John Talbot died at the Battle of Castillon, because he had entered the battlefield wearing no armor. Sir John understood quite well, what could be caused by such a neglect of own safety, but he had no choice. Shortly before that, when he was released from captivity, he promised “never to wear armor against the French King again.”


KHODORKOVSKY’S «LEFT TURN 2»
Boris Kagarlitsky

18.11.2005

Mikhail Khodorkovsky truly wants people consider him left. Reputation of a hero suffering for the toiling masses is the only thing the disgraced oligarch lacks to become a 100 percent political prisoner. It is one thing if a person has gone through a lot while fighting for power within political elite. There are also many passions and sacrifices in this fight. We can take pity on the Shakespearian characters cast into prison cells of the Tower, but they are not political prisoners. Their struggles had nothing to do with the politics which reflects concerns of masses.


KHODORKOVSKY HAS A NEW RECIPE TO “COOK” THE LEFTISTS…
Boris Kagarlitsky

05.08.2005

I can’t help admitting that when Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a model liberal oligarch, I fancied him more. What can one expect from an upright liberal? First of all, he should be tolerant towards others’ views. He may (even has to) feel strongly about the left-wing, but, being an adherent of the pluralism, he also has to accept the fact, that left ideology is as necessary for a healthy democratic society, as his own.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation