Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


THE OUTCOME OF THE EXTRAORDINARY EU SUMMIT ON SOUTH OSSETIAN CONFLICT

Print version

VLADIMIR CHIZHOV,
Permanent representative of Russia in the European Union, Brussels

The outcome of the extraordinary EU summit held on September 1 in Brussels was more or less predictable, both in terms of the views expressed by the EU member states and in terms of the EU Presidency conclusion.

The prevailing position among the 27 EU member states is the commitment of continuing the dialog and promoting strategic partnership with Russia.

I think Europe understands that Russia could not just wait and watch its peacekeepers and its citizens killed in cold blood in the middle of the night. Reading the conclusions of the EU summit I do not see any reference to the disproportional use of force by Russia. What I see is a reference to the disproportional reaction. So evidently this implies that there was something to react to.

I was sure that any sanctions against Russia would not be considered as a really possible option by the EU. Because we live in the XXI century, in a new world, which is characterized by a large degree of interdependence, and Russia can not be isolated even if it would like to be.

On September 8, French President Nikolas Sarkozy will come to Moscow to continue the dialog with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev. I’m sure it will be an important element of our political cooperation.

We understand that the EU has some internal difficulties, it has to settle the problems with some individual members – one member in one case, another member in another case. So we are patient enough: the talks on the new partnership and cooperation agreement have already begun and will be continued on September 16, as it was planned. Russia needs these negotiations as much as the EU does, not less, but not more.

Speaking about the EU civilian reconstruction mission to Georgia, I would like to say that it is the matter of EU-Georgian relations. We’ll only be monitoring that EU does not repeat the mistakes of others by getting involved in the reconstruction of the Georgian military machine. And if the EU wants to help in economic reconstruction of South Ossetia, it will be certainly welcomed by Russia. But this involvement should be negotiated with the authorities of this newly independent state.

September 3, 2008




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

15.08.2008

USIP: AMERICA'S STRATEGIC BLUNDER IN GEORGIA AND THE DEATH OF THE ROSE REVOLUTION

What began on August 7 as a reckless act of aggression by Georgia to bludgeon South Ossetia into submission, quickly escalated to Russian military intervention in Georgia, and the conflict's transformation into a proxy war between the U.S. and Moscow.

12.08.2008

RFE/RL: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AGREE TO PEACE PLAN TO END FIGHTING

Georgia and Russia have agreed to an EU-sponsored peace plan to end five days of fierce fighting in Georgia that has killed at least several hundred people and left thousands homeless.

08.07.2008

EUROPE'S WORLD: THINK BIG, RUSSIA AND EUROPE, YOU BOTH NEED AN ENERGY COMMUNITY

Talks between Russia and Europe are so stymied by mutual suspicion that only a "big deal" can break the deadlock, says Timofei Bordachev. Cooperation over energy is a great opportunity to set bilateral relations on a whole new course.

27.06.2008

RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS: OPTIONS FOR THE EU-RUSSIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The 10-year Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Russian Federation and the European Union, which served to deepen and broaden relations between the parties, expired on November 30, 2007.


Expert forum
LUKASHENKA TRIES TO MAKE A CLEAR CHOICE

PAVEL USOV

01.09.2008

The main question, which has arisen before the Belarusian political elite, is with whom they should build relationships, with the East or with the West. The current political situation indicates that Belarus has reached a geopolitical impasse.


CONSEQUENCES OF THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFRONTATION

DAVID BERDZENISHVILI

29.08.2008

Russia’s decision to recognize the independence of Georgia's breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia has been made not only by the Russian President and the Russian political establishment, but also, regrettably, by the majority of the Russian citizens. Few people in Russia criticized their authorities.


THE REASONS FOR THE GEORGIAN OPERATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA

ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV

26.08.2008

When holding the military operation in South Ossetia the Georgian government tried to solve the problem of territorial integrity. If the military operation in South Ossetia had been successful, Saakashvili would have again recieved wide support from the Georgian population and his country could have been integrated into the Western community. 


MOSCOW’S REALITIES AND THE FUTURE OF GEORGIAN SOVEREIGNTY

GEORGETA POURCHOT

20.08.2008

The current Russian military operation in Georgia marks the beginning of the end for Georgian sovereignty. The peace deal brokered by France contains the seeds of further chipping away at Georgian territory.


RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN CONFLICT. EUROPE SUPPORTS THE U.S. POSITION

ALEKSANDR RAHR

20.08.2008

Yesterday I could say that in Europe there were differences in relation to Russia’s actions in South Ossetia. Some countries blamed Georgia for the conflict, others blamed Russia. But at present there is a different tendency.


THE OUTBREAK OF VIOLATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA IS AT ODDS WITH THE INTERESTS OF ALL THE PARTIES

ANDREY MAKARYCHEV

20.08.2008

South Ossetia and Georgia have been at war with each other since last week. The towns and cities came under fire, the reservists were mobilized. There are the killed and the wounded, and a lot of refugees.


WAR IN SOUTH OSSETIA – TIME TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS STILL REMAINS

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

12.08.2008

The guns are bellowing now in South Ossetia and Georgia, and muses of those who might mull over the solution of the grave crisis, are still silent. Many things including the people’s lives depend on how long the diplomats and policy-makers will be inactive.


RUSSIA-EU RELATIONS. THE PROSPECTS FOR THE NEW PARTNERSHIP AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT

KONSTANTIN KOSACHEV

08.07.2008

Speaking about the prospects of the negotiations on a new agreement, I would like to be wrong, but I think they will take a substantial amount of time. Now Russia has to negotiate with 27 EU members, not 12 as in 1994.


VLADIMIR PUTIN'S FOREIGN POLICY LEGACY. INTERNATIONAL AGENDA FOR DMITRY MEDVEDEV

ANDREY KOKOSHIN, FIRST DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DUMA COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND HIGH TECHNOLOGIES; FYODOR LUKYANOV, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF "RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS" MAGAZINE

16.04.2008

"The change consists in the fact that Russia can no longer influence the domestic policy of its neighbors. When that became clear Russia chose the pragmatic approach," Fyodor Lukyanov.



Opinion
UKRAINE’S INDEFENSIBLE POSITION - IN THE WAKE OF GEORGIA
John Marone

01.09.2008

Since 1991, Ukraine has sat on the fence like a country coquette with her back to her jealous ex-husband Russia, from which the country’s ‘elite’ have nevertheless continued to get rich on cheap gas, while batting her eyes at the glamorous West, which offers lots of nice gifts but never a firm proposal of marriage.


ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Jules Evans

27.08.2008

The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.


TRUE COLORS - UKRAINE'S REACTION TO CONFLICT IN SOUTH OSSETIA
John Marone

18.08.2008

By sending troops into Georgia earlier this month, the Kremlin has shown its willingness to use force to check the advance of the West into what it considers Russia's zone of influence. The pretext for the invasion, Georgia's military clampdown on its separatist region of South Ossetia, is irrelevant.


BAD HABITS ARE CONTAGIOUS
Boris Kagarlitsky

14.08.2008

Georgia has resolutely condemned Russia’s actions in Chechnya. Russia has severely criticized NATO actions towards Serbia. Later on the Georgian authorities tried to do the same thing in South Ossetia as the Russian authorities had done in Chechnya. Moscow decided to treat Georgia in the same way as NATO had treated Serbia.


VICIOUS CIRCLE
Boris Kagarlitsky

17.07.2008

The Russian foreign policy boringly runs around in circles: the row with Estonia on the historic past, the squabbles between Moscow and Kyiv over the Crimea and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, the confrontation with Georgia because of its breakaway republics etc. After having made a full circle we are back to square one - another conflict with Georgia.



Author’s opinion on other topics

EU-RUSSIA RELATIONS ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE EU-RUSSIA SUMMIT IN KHANTY-MANSIYSK

25 June 2008

The summit in the Russian city of Khanty-Mansiysk is the twenty first EU-Russia summit. The opening of negotiations on a new base agreement between Russia and the EU will be one of the main issues at the Khanty-Mansiysk summit.

 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation