|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE OUTCOME OF THE EXTRAORDINARY EU SUMMIT ON SOUTH OSSETIAN CONFLICT
VLADIMIR CHIZHOV,
Permanent representative of Russia in the European Union, Brussels
The outcome of the extraordinary EU summit held on September 1 in Brussels was more or less predictable, both in terms of the views expressed by the EU member states and in terms of the EU Presidency conclusion.
The prevailing position among the 27 EU member states is the commitment of continuing the dialog and promoting strategic partnership with Russia.
I think Europe understands that Russia could not just wait and watch its peacekeepers and its citizens killed in cold blood in the middle of the night. Reading the conclusions of the EU summit I do not see any reference to the disproportional use of force by Russia. What I see is a reference to the disproportional reaction. So evidently this implies that there was something to react to.
I was sure that any sanctions against Russia would not be considered as a really possible option by the EU. Because we live in the XXI century, in a new world, which is characterized by a large degree of interdependence, and Russia can not be isolated even if it would like to be.
On September 8, French President Nikolas Sarkozy will come to Moscow to continue the dialog with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev. I’m sure it will be an important element of our political cooperation.
We understand that the EU has some internal difficulties, it has to settle the problems with some individual members – one member in one case, another member in another case. So we are patient enough: the talks on the new partnership and cooperation agreement have already begun and will be continued on September 16, as it was planned. Russia needs these negotiations as much as the EU does, not less, but not more.
Speaking about the EU civilian reconstruction mission to Georgia, I would like to say that it is the matter of EU-Georgian relations. We’ll only be monitoring that EU does not repeat the mistakes of others by getting involved in the reconstruction of the Georgian military machine. And if the EU wants to help in economic reconstruction of South Ossetia, it will be certainly welcomed by Russia. But this involvement should be negotiated with the authorities of this newly independent state.
September 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest
|
Expert forum
LUKASHENKA TRIES TO MAKE A CLEAR CHOICE
|
PAVEL USOV
|
01.09.2008
|
The main question, which has arisen before the Belarusian political elite, is with whom they should build relationships, with the East or with the West. The current political situation indicates that Belarus has reached a geopolitical impasse.
|
CONSEQUENCES OF THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFRONTATION
|
DAVID BERDZENISHVILI
|
29.08.2008
|
Russia’s decision to recognize the independence of Georgia's breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia has been made not only by the Russian President and the Russian political establishment, but also, regrettably, by the majority of the Russian citizens. Few people in Russia criticized their authorities.
|
THE REASONS FOR THE GEORGIAN OPERATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA
|
ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV
|
26.08.2008
|
When holding the military operation in South Ossetia the Georgian government tried to solve the problem of territorial integrity. If the military operation in South Ossetia had been successful, Saakashvili would have again recieved wide support from the Georgian population and his country could have been integrated into the Western community.
|
MOSCOW’S REALITIES AND THE FUTURE OF GEORGIAN SOVEREIGNTY
|
GEORGETA POURCHOT
|
20.08.2008
|
The current Russian military operation in Georgia marks the beginning of the end for Georgian sovereignty. The peace deal brokered by France contains the seeds of further chipping away at Georgian territory.
|
RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN CONFLICT. EUROPE SUPPORTS THE U.S. POSITION
|
ALEKSANDR RAHR
|
20.08.2008
|
Yesterday I could say that in Europe there were differences in relation to Russia’s actions in South Ossetia. Some countries blamed Georgia for the conflict, others blamed Russia. But at present there is a different tendency.
|
WAR IN SOUTH OSSETIA – TIME TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS STILL REMAINS
|
ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE
|
12.08.2008
|
The guns are bellowing now in South Ossetia and Georgia, and muses of those who might mull over the solution of the grave crisis, are still silent. Many things including the people’s lives depend on how long the diplomats and policy-makers will be inactive.
|
VLADIMIR PUTIN'S FOREIGN POLICY LEGACY. INTERNATIONAL AGENDA FOR DMITRY MEDVEDEV
|
ANDREY KOKOSHIN, FIRST DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DUMA COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND HIGH TECHNOLOGIES; FYODOR LUKYANOV, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF "RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS" MAGAZINE
|
16.04.2008
|
"The change consists in the fact that Russia can no longer influence the domestic policy of its neighbors. When that became clear Russia chose the pragmatic approach," Fyodor Lukyanov.
|
|
Opinion
UKRAINE’S INDEFENSIBLE POSITION - IN THE WAKE OF GEORGIA
|
John Marone |
01.09.2008
|
Since 1991, Ukraine has sat on the fence like a country coquette with her back to her jealous ex-husband Russia, from which the country’s ‘elite’ have nevertheless continued to get rich on cheap gas, while batting her eyes at the glamorous West, which offers lots of nice gifts but never a firm proposal of marriage.
|
ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
|
Jules Evans |
27.08.2008
|
The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.
|
TRUE COLORS - UKRAINE'S REACTION TO CONFLICT IN SOUTH OSSETIA
|
John Marone |
18.08.2008
|
By sending troops into Georgia earlier this month, the Kremlin has shown its willingness to use force to check the advance of the West into what it considers Russia's zone of influence. The pretext for the invasion, Georgia's military clampdown on its separatist region of South Ossetia, is irrelevant.
|
BAD HABITS ARE CONTAGIOUS
|
Boris Kagarlitsky |
14.08.2008
|
Georgia has resolutely condemned Russia’s actions in Chechnya. Russia has severely criticized NATO actions towards Serbia. Later on the Georgian authorities tried to do the same thing in South Ossetia as the Russian authorities had done in Chechnya. Moscow decided to treat Georgia in the same way as NATO had treated Serbia.
|
VICIOUS CIRCLE
|
Boris Kagarlitsky |
17.07.2008
|
The Russian foreign policy boringly runs around in circles: the row with Estonia on the historic past, the squabbles between Moscow and Kyiv over the Crimea and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, the confrontation with Georgia because of its breakaway republics etc. After having made a full circle we are back to square one - another conflict with Georgia.
|
|
Author’s opinion on other topics
|
|
|
|