Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



BORIS  KAGARLITSKY, MOSCOW
20 LOST YEARS

Print version               


The East European countries began celebrating jubilees, the historians and political scientists in the Western countries hold conferences and discussions: twenty years have passed since the “autumn revolutions”, which started the democratic epoch in the former Communist countries.

It is the worst time to observe the anniversary. The new regimes in Eastern Europe are suffering acute social, economic and political crises. Illusions are lost, the public enthusiasm of the late eighties provokes the people’s sneers and nothing but. The main problem is not that after the lapse of 20 years since the transition to the new system, Eastern Europe is still much poorer than Western Europe, that the economic conditions of the great part of the population have worsened since the Communist epoch, and that people feel nostalgic for bygone social protection and predictability. The main problem is that the public life has no prospects, goals and sense.

The democratic procedures have come to normal, but they are becoming more and more meaningless. We can elect one parliamentary or presidential candidate, but all of the candidates are as like as two peas in a pod and, in reality, they are equally disgusting. Mass media are free, but they contain neither ideas, nor discussions, nor even analyses. The Communist propaganda myths are removed from the education system and from the school textbooks only to pave the way for new myths, which are still more absurd and imposed still more aggressively than the previous ones.

The 1989 change was connected with the mass movement of East Germany’s citizens to the West. The reasons for that movement were political rather than economic. Then a joke about a dog crossing the Western Germany-Eastern Germany frontier was popular: “Is the food bad there?”, “No, I am not allowed to bark!”.

Now people can speak on different subjects, but they do not wish to do that.

The East European societies are both unhappy about the current situation and demoralized. That’s why when the people become much angrier than they were in 1989, nothing like the 1989 actions takes place now. The Communist regimes (in spite of the lack of civil freedoms, chronic commodity shortage and bureaucratic control) cultivated in the people optimism, self-respect, faith in themselves and confidence in their future. In 1989 all those positive traits of the people got the regimes, which had formed such psychology and culture, into trouble. The philistines wanted to become full-fledged citizens demanding the rights and freedoms. After all, they were formally given the rights and freedoms, but those people lost their informal right to participate in public life, which they had had under the Communist rule, though the right was restricted.

No wonder that only one issue, which is far from being optimistic, can be seriously discussed in Eastern Europe today – why have the reforms resulted in a failure?

The answer is simple enough: the transition from one system to another, even though it was accompanied by democratic slogans and mass actions, was, in fact, implemented by the elite who solved their own problems reestablishing the public institutions for their own convenience and benefits. The East European optimistic society was the extremely naïve society, which is one of the reasons for its optimism. As a result, the people let the elites take advantage of their enthusiasm and their hopes. Today the former national heritage is shared among people from high society and branches of transnational corporations. The naivety of the late eighties has become a thing of the past. The population came to know what is what. But at present illusions are replaced by cynicism, which is bad for carrying out social reforms.

Boris Kagarlitsky is a Director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements

October 26, 2009



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Opinion
POSSIBLE BREAK-UP OF THE EURO AREA
Boris Kagarlitsky

20.03.2009

Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, said on March 6, 2009, that a default couldn’t take place in a euro area country and the assumption that the euro area could break up was “nonsense”. The statement is strange if to take into account that mass media said neither about the euro area break-up nor about the default.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation