Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



BORIS  KAGARLITSKY, MOSCOW
THE HEILIGENDAMM LESSON

Print version               


On my airplane journey from Berlin back to Moscow I was looking through the Russian press. The front page stories were devoted to the G8 meeting and the counter-summit held in Heiligendamm and Rostock, respectively.

I was really astounded with what I read there. It was not only that the information was, to say the least, a bit inadequate (I’d rather reserve from writing that all the colleagues journalists are unscrupulous liars). I had a strong impression that all the Russian journalists had participated in some different Summit, somewhere in a different country - or was it in a parallel world?

Having read the press, one would assume that our native journalists either don’t have good command of foreign languages or hadn’t visited the event at all. Or even if they visited the Summit, they must have been staying in the hotel consuming vodka which they had providently fetched along. And you bet they hadn’t even watched TV!

Should you compare coverage of the two Summits by the Russian and German press, you will inevitably see the pivotal difference between the two cultures – the western journalist respond to the events (they may differently interpret or even pervert facts, but whatever interpretation, the event dominates the commentary). The Russian newsmen care in the first place about the status of a person or an event. The world political establishment gathered in Heiligendamm last week – and that was worth of our journalists’ attention. Tens of thousands of people were protesting in Rostock concurrently with the G8 Summit – Russian mass media simply ignored the ‘motley horde’, for the protesters didn’t seem to be of decent social status. But the journalists as usually were wrong, for in Rostock there were MPs, influential members of the Lutheran Church who invited the counter-summit to hold its sessions in the Gothic cathedrals of the town (Can you think of a similar act from the part of the Russian Orthodox church?). Right after the Summit the Germans participated in the Church Day (Kirchen Tag) – the event was just another occasion to voice all the issues raised in Rostock, and even the speakers were the same.

But neither the role of the Church nor the hordes of protesters, nor their successful blockade of the summit matters separately. What matters is that for the European society the G8 meeting was not the central event, while the opposition’s actions attracted attention of many. Even the conservative media covered the counter-summit more than the G8 meeting: in the beginning of a news spot they gave obligatory information from Heiligendamm and then turned to real events in Rostock where the young protesters were engaged in non-violent struggle with the police. Even the conservative journalists expressed indignation at the G8 leaders’ failure to undertake concerted actions in order to tackle climate change. And certainly nobody took seriously the promises to allocate 60 bln to Africa. They had promised the larger part of the money long ago, but still haven’t allocated it. So the world leaders continued summing up their promises!

All the commentators agreed that mere allocation of money won’t suffice without changing the policy. But the G8 leaders can’t agree on what to change and how. And that is their major failure.

The protests, on the contrary, kept the international community agitated. The news persons skipped the Heiligendamm official part (the ironical comments usually focused on the G8 weakness and inefficiency of the top-level talks).

Vladimir Putin managed to shock the public by the announcement about possible joint US-Russian exploitation of radar base in Azerbaijan. The general astonishment could be explained in terms of Russia making a U-turn – not long ago the Kremlin condemned the US policy in Iran, now Putin has proposed Bush cooperation against Iran.

It is not surprising that the comments were skeptical. And it must not surprise us in the future that Russia’s western partners will put little trust in its policy. For traditionally they trust partners who are predictable…

The opponents of globalization, in their turn, proved that they have social support. It became particularly evident in Rostock. Unlike the Prague burgers, who in 2000 had locked up in their houses at seeing the antiglobalists in their city, the Rostock citizens greeted the protesters with posters and flags in their windows and balconies of their houses, participated in discussions and supplied the young people from all over Germany with food and water. Even in the Warnemunde beach one could see the anti G8 placards. “Illegal, but right” (“Illegal aber richtig”) – that is how the left “die TAZ” qualified the antiglobalist actions, while the conservative “Sueddeutsche Zeitung” made the blockade of the Summit by the activists sound epic: “The march of five thousands”. Free from the protocol conventions the local press covered mainly the grassroots protests. On June 9, all the press had on the front pages similar pictures of lonely Angela Merkel in Heiligendamm and contrasting photos of hordes of protesters in Rostock.

The Heiligendamm boils down to acknowledging that the moral climate in Europe has drastically changed: ideas that only a year ago were considered to be marginal now are included in the public debate, while the traditional stances of the G8 leaders seem out-of-date. Heiligendamm gathered people of the past, while the hordes protesting in Rostock will make the future. It is not about age – the thing is that the society has changed.

The German press was smart enough to learn the Heiligendamm-Rostock lesson. Hopefully, a part of the German elite will try to meet the challenge. As for the Russian press and bureaucrats, they are too weak students, and Heiligendamm has once again proved it.

Boris Kagarlitsky is Director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements

June 15, 2007



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Expert forum
G8 SUMMIT IN HEILEGENDAMM

ALEKSANDR RAHR

07.06.2007

At the Summit the world leaders create the stabilizing atmosphere showing that they have many interests in common. So, neither George Bush nor Vladimir Putin are expected to make strongly-worded statements.



Opinion
PUTIN’S POLICY OF ‘OBNOXIOUS RISE’
Jules Evans

14.06.2007

I don’t understand why Vladimir Putin feels the need to be so belligerent and obnoxious in international relations. OK, he’s aggressively asserting Russia’s new economic power, and it plays well with some insecure people at home who prefer to be ‘feared’ by foreign powers rather than free in their own country. But there’s no need to be so belligerent, and ultimately it defeats his own aims.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation