Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



BORIS  KAGARLITSKY, MOSCOW
THE PRESIDENT’S BLUNDER

Print version               


And so we are told that the Russian President Vladimir Putin stays in power. But if he becomes Prime Minister, what will Dmitry Medvedev do? Will he indeed become President?!

Such reshuffles normally end in political instability and social woes. I can only hope that the both don’t mean what they’ve claimed.

The Putin-Medvedev tandem is not a bad strategic alliance in terms of the forthcoming presidential election. Especially, given the following considerations: it is next to impossible to make the mediocre and not too popular with the citizens Medvedev frontrunner of the presidential election. Medvedev definitely lacks Putin’s enigma and charisma. So the spin-doctors in the Kremlin reasoned out that launching a “two-in-one” campaign would be much more efficient. Now we have Putin and Medvedev being marketed just like a shampoo and conditioner “in one bottle”. Let see who is the shampoo and who is the conditioner.

You might think that Putin is the shampoo, i.e. the main ingredient, and Medvedev the conditioner. But it may turn that it is vice versa.

The Kremlin bureaucrats might have intended to consolidate the state administrative system, but they have failed to do so. During the expiring year, they have been making one blunder after another, which will inevitably tell in the coming year and even further. The bureaucrats are as always indulgent to their own blunders.

During the election campaign, the authorities with the help from the bureaucrats have ruined the United Russia Party, which was quite and expensive and time-consuming project. The Party was intended to become the institutional backup of the new regime, a democratic equivalent of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, but failed to become an independent political organism. The current elections testify that the United Russia Party totally depends on the administrative machine – so the Party owes its victory to the outgoing President. Normally, you would have the column to support the ceiling, but the United Russia, as well as the Just Russia Party, is a useless column pending in the air attached to the ceiling threatening to ruin the whole building.

But it was Putin who made the gross blunder. He should have to let the citizens know beforehand that he was going to stay. He then should have reorganized the bureaucratic administrative machine and have made amendments to the laws. If he was set to leave the post, he should have insisted on this decision and refuse to take up in 2008 the new post, which the courtly Kremlin bureaucrats depending on the President’s favor, are trying to talk him into.

But the President didn’t have the guts to make his choice showing one more time that he is a weak politician.

As a result of the procrastination, the decision was made by the Kremlin inhabitants. And Putin had to accept his new part in their game. Still, he seemed so insecure of the future that one cannot be sure that he will finally become Prime Minister.

But if he does, he will have to rule the country in much more critical circumstances than before. Nobody would envy a person who is to be Prime Minster during the crisis – the one who will be responsible for the agricultural sector in the times of the crop failure or tackle the food prices with inflation booming, or finally be responsible for social peace in the height of class struggle.

Can you think of a Farrow changing place with Josef when the “thin cows” have come? This Farrow might be into some trouble, I am afraid…

In addition to objective economic and social consequences, we will have to live with bureaucratic diarchy, guessing which of the two has more political clout. It is quite possible that Medvedev will still be at home with subordinate positions. But will Medvedev’s second Deputy Minister be subordinate to Putin’s Third Deputy, will the bureaucratic machine be efficient now that neither the law nor the internal administrative regulations say how it must function.

The magical transformation of the President into Prime Minister is potent with paralyzing the work of both the Presidential Administration and the Cabinet of Ministers. The informal right to rule the country from the Kremlin was legitimated by the nationally acclaimed bureaucratic tsar. Now that Putin gives away his practically royal powers, this scheme is no longer viable.

The President’s blunder will cost the whole political system stability. How will he act now? It would be a thrill to follow the developments. But 140 million Russians following the situation might be depressed to find the developments adversely affect their as it is miserable existence.

Boris Kagarlitsky is Director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements

December 29, 2007



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

11.12.2007

RFE/RL: RUSSIA: PUTIN PICKS HIS HEIR

The president has named a successor who embodies two key qualities. Medvedev is both loyal enough to allow Putin to continue de facto rule, and weak enough to avoid upsetting the delicate balance among the warring clans of security-service veterans.

18.10.2007

RFE/RL: INSIDE THE CORPORATION: RUSSIA'S POWER ELITE

Russia is run by a collective leadership -- the Kremlin Corporation's board of directors, so to speak. Putin is the front man and public face for an elite group of seasoned bureaucrats.

02.10.2007

RFE/RL: PUTIN MAKES NEXT MOVE IN 'OPERATION SUCCESSOR'

The idea is to create a sort of super-prime minister role for Putin. Putin can then turn over the diminished presidency to Zubkov or another obedient successor.


Opinion
THE VOTE IS OVER, FORGET ABOUT IT!
Boris Kagarlitsky

17.12.2007

The Central Election Commission has counted the vote returns – the parties that were meant to make it into the State Duma are already there occupying their places. Accuracy of the forecast given before the election by the Kremlin-friendly experts, keeps one guessing if the whole costly procedure was aimed at implementing into life a cooked-up scheme.


ODD QUESTIONS
Boris Kagarlitsky

19.10.2007

The American society wants changes and is afraid of changes. Americans want the politicians to rise to a challenge. The Russian society is also afraid of changes, but doesn’t want to change at all. Russians don’t demand their politicians to do anything about it – people are afraid of the authorities’ reaction.


LIFE AFTER PUTIN
Boris Kagarlitsky

05.07.2007

The problem is that Vladimir Putin is the only official in Russia who has real authority or at least popularity at the level of the whole nation. No other bureaucrat can pretend to grade up to the incumbent president in popular support ratings. Resentment against the bureaucrats is the dominant social feeling. 


WILL RUSSIA HAVE A CARETAKER PRESIDENT FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS?
Jules Evans

22.06.2007

For the last couple of years, much ink has been spilled by hacks and pundits on the ‘2008 problem’. The problem being that the Russian constitution only lets a president rule for two consecutive terms, so president Putin is obliged to step down, even though he enjoys approval ratings of over 80%. Russia now seems remarkably calm about 2008 presidential elections.


THE PROBLEM OF 2008
Boris Kagarlitsky

14.09.2006

The 2008 presidential election poses for the Kremlin a problem with an unambiguous solution. It’s high time to look around for Vladimir Putin’s successor. At the same time there is nobody to succeed to Putin.


PUTIN TO STAY ON AS PARTY LEADER?
Jules Evans

03.07.2006

I don’t envy Putin’s successor. He will come to power despite the fact that the majority of Russians want Putin to stay on. He will have the irritating presence of Putin, still young and healthy, somewhere behind him. He will no doubt hear constant negative comparisons between his rule and the golden age of Putinism, and constant calls for Vladimir Vladimirovich to return and lead the country back to glory.


MEDVEDEV: WHAT I’D DO IF I WAS IN CHARGE
Jules Evans

06.06.2006

I managed to sneak into a private speech that Dmitri Medvedev, deputy prime minister of Russia, gave to around 100 editors at the World Editors Forum in Moscow. He launched into a rather boring speech about the Russian economy, when the interpreter ear-pieces broke down. So his speech was abandoned and we went straight to questions from the floor instead.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation