Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



JOHN  MARONE, KYIV
THE YEAR OF LIVING CAREFULLY

Print version               


There is an eerie feeling in Eastern Europe. The color revolutions have faded like a well worn tie-dyed t-shirt that once looked bright but always lacked a clear design. The revolutionary dream of former Soviet satellite states to join Western Europe was always vague if for no other reason than Western Europe’s own lack of identity and purpose. Now, the dreamers are awakening to a new, uncertain and ominously familiar day.

The global financial crisis cannot be blamed for the descending malaise, although economic prosperity was definitely a large part of the dream. Instead, the failures of banks and currencies have merely served to highlight a more serious bankruptcy – that of a unifying European idea.

The creation of the EU has been top-down and largely in response to American economic might and Asian economic potential. A mosaic of bureaucracies with little vision, much less a diplomacy or military to stand up for itself, the EU has been shaken by nothing more than a predictable economic downturn.

Countries like Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia have been left on the doorstep of the tottering structure, as unwelcome as they are uncertain about going in.

The recent Prague Summit between the EU and its so-called eastern partners was the latest in a recent string of disappointing signs of European disunity. The divide between east and west was as evident as the division between individual EU member states.

The declaration of eastern partnership that came out of the summit set a new benchmark in waffling.

It’s as if the EU had invited more guests than it could feed to a dinner and now is afraid to tell them to go home.

The former Soviet satellites of the Black Seas region were, of course, never formally invited. Instead, they have been courted and teased while being taught to mind their manners.

The situation is made more awkward by the EU’s already significant advances in the other direction. Several major European banks couldn’t wait to set up shop in Ukraine, handing out credit on every street corner while overheating the fledgling economy.

Now these same banks, the missionaries of capitalism, are beating a retreat. Some will stay and wait for better times, but only after getting a fresh injection of capital from very non-capitalist public lenders.

The divide between the recipients and non-recipients of EU aid is another one of those signals not lost on Ukraine’s deputy prime minister in charge of external relations, Hryhory Nemyria.

International lenders such as the IMF have pledged billions of dollars to help Kyiv and other hard-hit countries weather the current financial crisis, but the EU appears to be looking after its own.

“Why is the EU so reluctant?” Nemyria asked during a recent EBRD conference, echoing the frustration inevitably felt by other Europhile Ukrainian statesmen.

Europeans may see a chance to get off the hook by pointing to recent signs that the global economic crisis might not be as bad as first expected.

Thomas Mirow, president of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, expressed such optimism.

However, any future efforts by the EU to reach out to Ukraine as well as Moldova and Georgia are likely to be a little too little and a little too late.

There is the issue of visas, which Europeans going to Ukraine don’t need but Ukrainians going to EU countries do, and other such snubs that may very well be justified.

But perhaps the greatest obstacle to ‘full European unity’ is more about geopolitics than economics.

European heavyweights such as France and Germany have time and again shown themselves reluctant to risk damaging their relations with Russia on account of its former satellites.

They have opposed NATO membership for Ukraine and undermined their own energy security for fear of angering Moscow. Russia showed itself willing to use force during its brief war with Georgia and continues to saber rattle in the Caucuses.

Matters in Moldova have been handled more subtly, with the country’s briefly Western-looking Communist president now boldly aping the Kremlin’s methods for quelling pesky street protesters.

The unrecognized Dniester Region could easily, however, provide a pretext for Moscow’s military expansion into that corner of the former Soviet Union.

Then there is Crimea – a larger kettle of fish to be sure, but certainly not off bounds to Moscow leaders who might feel they have nothing to lose from military adventurism.

Certainly the European Union would hardly prevent such a scenario. One can just imagine the French and Germans quibbling over how to word a statement of rebuke, while the Poles and Lithuanians pull their hair out, and the Hungarians and Italians cut another lucrative gas deal with Gazprom.

In fairness to the Europeans, the United States under President ‘Reset-the-Button’ Obama may also prove reluctant to check Russian aggression in Moscow’s backyard.

The US is war-weary and tapped on cash from its adventures in Iraq. Moreover, it’s questionable whether even the more bellicose Mr. Bush would have risked military intervention over a country like Ukraine or Georgia.

No few European leaders may very soon look back on the Bush years with nostalgia, for this was a time when Brussels could let Washington do all the dirty work, while criticizing America from its ivory tower.

With Obama, an untested and highly inexperienced leader, it’s anyone’s guess. The same can be said of the Kremlin, which seems to be in a battle with itself, weakened by corruption, vulnerable to world energy prices and irritated by its stroppy neighbors.

Ironically, the European Union may be the most predictable power in the region, as it is sure to do nothing that requires political will.

In such a situation, a year of living carefully for Western powers, countries like Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova must have an eerie feeling about their future. Instability or repression from within and anger or indifference from abroad are already here and now. What lies ahead is likely more of the same and possibly worse.

John Marone, a columnist of Eurasian Home website, Kyiv, Ukraine

May 19, 2009



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Opinion
THE EXTENSION OF UKRAINIAN HOSPITALITY
John Marone

28.04.2009

Ukrainians are a hospitable nation, and that cannot be denied. To be sure, the people here don’t smile as a matter of civility, and service-industry workers are sometimes blunt to the point of rudeness. But anyone who has been invited to a Ukrainian home can attest to the warmth and attention with which their hosts invariably received them.


NO MORE SUPERPOWER PLAYOFFS
John Marone

10.12.2008

For centuries, Ukraine's Cossacks were able to play off the superpowers of their time. Some would argue that the survival of the Ukrainian nation depended on a 'flexible' foreign policy. Unfortunately, the result of this policy was a culture of persistent internal division that eventually led to Russian domination.


THE EUROPEAN SUBCONTINENT
Ivan Gayvanovych

01.10.2008

In Transcarpathia, near the Ukrainian village of Delovoe, there are three geodetic signs indicating the geographic center of the European subcontinent. The first sign was put up in 1887 under Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria. The second one was set up by the members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. The third one was put up in the first years of Ukraine’s independence after the Soviet Union had collapsed.



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation