Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


THE NEW RUSSIAN PRESIDENT AND BELARUS: SLUGGISH POLITICAL EMANCIPATION, ACTIVE ECONOMIC EXPANSION?

Print version

BELARUSIAN INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES, NASHA NIVA WEEKLY, MINSK

Presidential elections in Russia have been an event of international importance. A succession scenario had been implemented, although the former President, Vladimir Putin, still controls power being the Prime-Minister and the leader of the largest faction in the State Duma. What does this mean for Belarus? Participants of the roundtable (May 16, 2008) sponsored by the Nasha Niva weekly and the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies agreed that the new power configuration in Russia would only slightly change the existing character of Belarus-Russia relationships. First, decision-makers responsible for policy development and implementation towards Belarus have not been replaced. Second, the parameters of Belarus-Russia interaction are to a large degree determined by the oil and gas sector situation, where important changes have already occurred. Third, whoever is in Kremlin, Belarus faces some important changes emanating from economic and social developments in Russia.

Putin’s Eight Years and Belarus: Was There a Real Break from Yeltsin?

It is President Vladimir Putin who suggested in 2002 – against the background of gas conflict initiated by Gazprom – to incorporate Belarus by Russia (specifically, six regions of Belarus could have joined Russia). This move of the Kremlin had in fact promoted the formation of the consensus on the necessity to preserve political independence inside Belarus. This is the major outcome of the Putin’s two presidential terms for Belarus. Yet, independence provides sensible economic benefits for the country. Indeed, ‘special relations’ with Russia allow the Belarusian state budget to collect up to one-third of its revenues and to subsidize domestic industry via lower, than in the neighboring countries, gas prices. Although economic rationale is important in constructing relations with Belarus, geopolitical ambitions often prevail in Russia’s reasoning towards Belarus. This reasoning permeates the action of “business-oriented” corporations like Gazprom as well, directly or indirectly connected to the political authority of Russia. Hence, political factors have been firmly entwined with the fabric of bilateral economic relationships. In spite of many predictions politics was not fully dislodged from the Belarus-Russia economic relations under Putin, and “politicization” only increased by the end of his second term as a president. It is premature, therefore, to declare that Putin’s presidency put a complete end to the ‘romantic’ period in Belarus-Russia relations, when promises of integration were traded for economic benefits. Russia may not harbor previous illusions, but new leadership will be forced to engage with Belarus, regardless of liking or disliking of its leader, for more fundamental and structural reasons.

President Medvedev: A New Deal?

A range of factors will slow down implementation of Kremlin’s policy innovations (if there are any) towards Belarus. On the one hand, Russia is locked-in into its own way of modernization from above, so the decisions made (including foreign policy ones) tend to revolve around the chosen developmental path. Some ‘phase’ fluctuations are unable to change the strategic policy orientation. On the other hand, there are spacious regional processes and regional division of labor, which Belarus and Russia are a part and parcel of. These factors tend to cement the character of bilateral relations.

Besides, it is apparent that a new deal is unlikely to emerge. At least, it is too premature to wait for a revision of the policy stance towards Belarus. The reason is that the ‘core’ of the Russian political elite responsible for policies towards Belarus during the Putin’s presidency is still in power. Moreover, Vladimir Putin as the Prime-Minister of the Russian Federation controls economic levers and mechanisms of influence on the policies of state corporations like Gazprom. In addition, the former Deputy Chairman of Presidential Administration and now the Deputy Prime-Minister, Igor Sechin, responsible for industrial complex, and Sergey Prihodko, who is a ‘curator’ of Belarusian policy dimension during both Yeltsin and Putin's presidencies, retain their seats.

Medvedev or Putin: Does it Make Any Difference for Belarus?

Regardless of who is the ‘real ruler’ of Russia, whether he is ‘liberal’ or not by the political orientation, Belarus-Russia relationships will be heavily influenced by a general tendency of the Russian political establishment to refuse treating Belarus as ‘foreign country’ or independent nation, and to consider it as a some proximate territory instead. Besides, the perception of Belarus as a geopolitical ‘shield’ is not to vanish, irrespective of the level and character of the relationships between Russia and Western countries. As soon as these moods and perceptions are available, the politics of economic subsidization of Belarus by providing economic preferences and privileged access to the Russian market would be preserved, although some changes or restrictions could be expected. Perhaps, Dmitry Medvedev, as a representative of new generation of politicians, is less inclined to accept these stereotypes, but his role as a President would force him to embody the views and attitudes of the Russian political elite as a whole. Even one assumes that chances for political and national emancipation of Belarus are higher because of the Medvedev’s presidency (in contrast to all other candidates for successor’s role discussed in 2007), this process would be sluggish at best.

Nevertheless, this support is not cost-free for the Belarusian authorities. Russian companies have a range of plans to occupy the Belarusian economic space. And the attempts to implement these plans are not related to the figure of the real leader of Russia. Most likely, sooner or later these expansionist plans would be realized. Right now Russians are keen to purchase ‘Azot’ company, a largest consumer of natural gas in Belarus, while the company’s survival is directly related to its ability to cope with growing energy costs. Despite the strong interest of Russian companies, few projects have been realized in practice so far. This suggests the lack of efficiency of Putin’s policies of ‘mastering’ of Belarus’ space or the existence of some powerful pro-Belarusian lobby capable of blocking the advancement of the interests of Russian business. Probably, Medvedev’s term could activate lobbying on the Russian side so the Russian companies would acquire property shares in some of their Belarusian counterparts.

At the same time, there are serious changes underway in Russia challenging the Belarusian model in a number of ways regardless of the character of Belarus-Russia relationships. In particular, policies of reduction of red tape and improvement of business climate in Russia make the country more attractive than Belarus as a destination for foreign investors. Moreover, Russia strives for the WTO membership, and, if achieved, this would mean a competitiveness challenge for Belarus whose foreign trade would fall on the WTO member states. It is also important to mention that Belarus today is facing a lack of experienced managers of various kind and even skilled ‘blue collar’ workers opting for a temporary labor migration to Russia (according to various estimates, between 400,000 and 850,000 Belarusians are temporarily employed in Russia). All these factors make the task of enhancing national competitiveness more urgent than before regardless of who controls the Kremlin.

Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS) is registered in Vilnius, Lithuania. The BISS mission is the development of public dialogue to formulate positive alternatives for Belarus and to search for the ways of building a healthy, prosperous, and competitive nation. More information about the BISS activities can be found at: www.belinstitute.eu

June 24, 2008




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Expert forum
INTEGRATION IMITATION WILL CONTINUE. DMITRY MEDVEDEV AND VLADIMIR PUTIN’S TACTICS AGAINST ALIAKSANDR LUKASHENKA

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

26.06.2008

Moscow’s main aim is to stop the parasitical relations with Lukashenka's regime without serious damage to the cooperation, and to establish friendly but, at the same time, pragmatic relations with the Belarusian state, which let the Kremlin keep Minsk in Russia’s sphere of influence.


NEW ROUND OF THE MINSK-MOSCOW GAS RAW

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

02.08.2007

It is hard for Belarus to appeal to Europe as one of the potential affected parties in the gas conflict between Minsk and Moscow. Earlier this leverage could be effective, but now it is restricted and will not be decisive for the Russian company Gazprom.


DOES BELARUS-RUSSIA UNION HAVE A FUTURE?

VALERY FEDOROV, VLADIMIR PETUKHOV

19.02.2007

Intricate integration processes are taking place in the former Soviet Union. And there is a danger that as time goes by and new generation grows up, it will become more and more difficult to solve the problems of reintegration in the post-Soviet space.


BELARUS-RUSSIA: OIL AND GAS MADNESS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

11.01.2007

The oil conflict showed the extreme weakness of the regulatory framework of the bilateral relations between Belarus and Russia, lack of legal culture, and powerful potential for conflicts development.


RUSSIAN - BELARUSIAN RELATIONS: ENERGY WAR

ALEKSANDER FADEEV

11.01.2007

At present I would not say that Belarus’ lifting duties on the Russian oil transit to Europe gives evidence of a compromise between Moscow and Minsk.


PROSPECTS FOR THE BELARUS-RUSSIA RELATIONS

OLEG MANAEV

18.12.2006

The recent visit of Belarusian President Aliaksandr Lukashenka to Russia (December 15) shows that Moscow continues with its putting pressure on him. The main objective of the Kremlin officials is to strengthen Russia’s control over Belarus and its economy.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE FUTURE OF THE UNION STATE

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

14.12.2006

Belarus-Russia Union State has never existed. Since 2002 the Union State bodies have not made any important decisions, they have not achieved any serious breakthroughs.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

05.12.2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has concentrated all Belarusian diplomacy and Belarus’ foreign policy on Russia. For the last 10 years Minsk has conducted explicitly unilateral foreign policy in order to win Moscow’s favor.


THE BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

15.06.2006

The issue of Gazprom’s gas price increase for Belarus has found a lodgment in the agenda of the Belarusian-Russian relations. Still, serious tensions have not yet emerged.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

15.05.2006

The fact, that right after the presidential elections in Belarus the Kremlin has stated that the gas prices will be raised for Minsk, is quite explainable.


GAS PRICES FOR BELARUS TO GO UP

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

31.03.2006

I believe that the myth of the Belarus-Russia Union is being destroyed, and the current scheme which was employed by Russia on drafting an agreement with Belarus about gas cooperation is nearing its end as well.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: ECONOMIC COOPERATION

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

29.03.2006

If to judge about the Belarusian-Russian relations just by the crude figures of the Belarus’ trade balance, the two countries are definitely at a trade war.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

02.02.2006

Regardless all Moscow and Minsk’s assurances about mutual understanding, progress and relationships improvement, the course of discussion and passing of the most important documents do show that the integration between Belarus and Russia remains on paper.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

13.09.2005

Lukashenka is aware of the fact that the Kremlin officials discuss various scenarios of Russia’s reaction to the upcoming political events in Belarus.



Analysis

21.03.2008

POWER POKER: AN EXAMINATION INTO THE DYNAMICS OF THE CURRENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RUSSIA AND BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes the Belarus Brief  "Power Poker: An Examination into the Dynamics of the Current Relationship between Russia and Belarus" by Andrei Liakhovich, Center for Political Education, Minsk.


09.10.2007

TOWARDS A NEW VISION OF BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS) publishes synopsis of the international conference "Towards a New Vision of Belarus" which was held on September 10-12 in Kyiv, Ukraine.


29.09.2007

BELARUS BRIEF: COSMETIC SURGERY IN BELARUS: TOWARD A NEW REGIME

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis entitled "Cosmetic Surgery in Belarus: Toward a New Regime". In the light of the EU-Russia summit, the analysis offers a new look to the most important post-election development of Belarus.


22.12.2006

BELARUS BRIEF: HOW THE WEST CONTINUES TO LOSE BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes the Belarus Brief "How the West continues to lose Belarus" on the current situation in Belarus and outlining possible scenarios for the 2007 year.


26.05.2006

BELARUS BRIEF: STATE OF THE UNION AND THE UNION STATE

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis entitled “State of the Union and the Union State”. In the light of the EU-Russia summit, the analysis offers a new look to the most important post-election development of Belarus.


14.04.2006

BELARUS AFTER ELECTION: THE NAKED DICTATOR

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis prepared by the Minsk-based Center for Political Education entitled “Belarus after Election: The Naked Dictator”.  The analysis summaries the March events, draws conclusions from the reaction of authorities and the opposition and outlines the possible development for Belarus for the beginning of the third term of Alexander Lukashenka.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation