Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


INTEGRATION IMITATION WILL CONTINUE. DMITRY MEDVEDEV AND VLADIMIR PUTIN’S TACTICS AGAINST ALIAKSANDR LUKASHENKA

Print version

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK,
President of the Minsk-based Mizes Center, Belarus

Eurasian Home: “How do you assess the Russian-Belarusian relations during Vladimir Putin’s presidency?”

Vladimir Putin managed to do the things that were of interest to him and his team. He consolidated the control over Russia’s gas, oil and financial sectors after he had set himself this task and had given it priority. Putin managed to neutralize the oligarchs of the Yeltsin era, to take control of the mass media, to create the executive chain of command through abolition of the direct governor elections and by other means.

The Belarusian-Russian relations were very low on Vladimir Putin’s list of priorities. Aliaksandr Lukashenka gained an advantage over Putin and the Kremlin in every way. Here in Belarus ordinary people, high-ranking officials and the opposition have no doubts about that. Lukashenka got everything he had wanted from Moscow, and the Kremlin had to pay for it. The Russian authorities feigned that nothing had happened and only in 2007 (after the 2006 presidential election in Belarus) the Kremlin became a little more active starting to implement a different strategy towards Belarus. But even now it isn’t worked out.

The “Belarus-Russia Union” project remained on paper. Gazprom does not control the Belarusian “Beltransgaz” company. The single currency has not been introduced. The common economic space has not been created. There is no customs union and free trade area between Russia and Belarus. More than that, during the so called “gas and oil war” between Belarus and Russia the Kremlin and the Russian government ranked first among Belarus’ enemies in the Belarusian mass media.

Our governments signed a lot of documents but nobody is going to fulfill them. There are no institutions that would enforce the documents. Sham bodies of the fake Belarus-Russia Union are created and the parties seem to be happy about it.

Lukashenka actively resorted to the help of various lobbying groups in Russia to implement his own strategy in the relations with Moscow. The strategy was simple: to promise the Kremlin to integrate Belarus with Russia in exchange for cheap gas. For the last 10 years Russia has paid Belarus $45-50 billion for nothing. Since Russia is a rich country, nobody cares about losses.

The second scheme of Lukashenka’ strategy is the discrimination of the Russian goods: the Belarusian goods have an access to the Russian market, but the Russian goods are prevented from entering the Belarusian market. As the kickback schemes in the commercial relations between the Belarusian plants and the Russian trade companies, including those to whom Russian governors and mayors provide protection, were adjusted long ago, they were quite efficient. The Kremlin did not want to condescend to this level, so Lukashenka made the best of those schemes.

The third scheme is the admittance of the capitals, which are related to some Russian politicians and companies, to the market in exchange for the political lobbyism. Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov, the businessmen close to Gennady Zyuganov, leader of the Russian Communists, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alesksii II and the Russian Orthodox Church, the oil tycoons (Lukoil and Rosneft companies), some Russian key banks, Joint-stock Financial Corporation Systema and Itera International Group of Companies, Boris Berezovsky’s agents are powerful lobbyists who help Lukashenka to implement his schemes in the relations with Russia.

Vladimir Putin was not going to deprive Lukashenka of this support in Russia. If this were done, what would be the results? Maybe, the Belarusian opposition would come into power? Or, there would be destabilization and surge of anti-Russian attitudes? The majority of Belarusians believe that Russia must supply oil and gas to Belarus at low, subsidized prices. The parasitism with which the Russian-Belarusian relations are infected are a powerful tool for the Belurusian President to manipulate the Kremlin’s feelings and emotions. This factor was one of the reasons for Aliaksandr Lukashenka’s becoming the winner.

Finally, Lukashenka obtained cheap and long-term credits from the Russian government without making serious concessions. This financial “drug” helps him to assure the economic growth and to raise the income level of the population. In the medium term this will make Belarus dependent on Russia. But today the authorities are not concerned about that.

In June the Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian Federation stated that at least 23 protectionist measures were taken against the Russian goods in Belarus. It is symbolic that the formal Belarusian-Russian relations boiled down to the informal meetings of the Presidents including those in the Russian resort of Sochi and the Belarusian village of Silichi that is located 40 kilometers from Minsk.

Eurasian Home: “What are the main problems in the Russian-Belarus relations?”

Moscow’s main aim is to stop the parasitical relations with Lukashenka's regime without serious damage to the cooperation, and to establish friendly but, at the same time, pragmatic relations with the Belarusian state, which let the Kremlin keep Minsk in Russia’s sphere of influence. For the last ten years the Kremlin’s policy has consolidated the anti-Russian lobby among the Belarusian high-ranking officials rather than in the opposition. The officials became much more nationalistic and mercenary-minded. They would like to save their money into the shares of the Belarusian enterprises. That’s why the officials look on the Russian businessmen as their competitors who are far richer, more experienced, cruel and cynical than they are. So, another Kremlin’s task is to neutralize those Belarusian officials and to win the loyal politicians’ favour.

The second aim of the Kremlin is to launch the PR campaign in Belarus on necessity to increase the oil and gas prices to the world standards. Vladimir Putin understands that Aliaksandr Lukashenka can address the Belarusian people in a hysterical manner to support him and to come out against aggression of the Russian tycoons and the Kremlin. The Russian authorities cannot neutralize this kind of behavior, that’s why such arguments as “We waged war on the fascists together” or “Belarus is the only trustworthy ally” still exist.

The third aim of the Kremlin is not to frighten off Lukashenka and to continue the aggressive takeover of the Belarusian financial market. The banking system is being seized by the Russians very dynamically. The schemes to turn debts into Belarusian assets are being drawn up. It will take Russia another two years to take control of Belarus’ financial system, and then Moscow will be able to lay down its conditions to Lukashenka before the 2011 presidential election.

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev will try to act as the bad and good cops but there is no reason for believing that Belarus will be of slightly more importance to the new Russian President than it was to Vladimir Putin. So, Lukashenka’s lobbyists in Russia will go on supporting his regime, only at the expense of the Russian budget and discrimination of the Russian small and medium-size business.

Evidently, such boring issues as Belarus-Russia Union, single currency and unification of the laws will be on the agenda of the meetings between the Russian and Belarusian leaders. The parties will come to terms about the fight against NATO enlargement, the trade in arms and the cooperation between their special services and the Ministries of the Interior. Dmitry Medvedev, Vladimir Putin and Aliaksandr Lukashenka will certainly agree with each other over our “heroic past”, the actions of the USA and the Estonian revisionists.

If there are no upheavals, the Russian-Belarusian relations will not change until 2011. I want to stress one important thing. At present, time is not on Lukashenka’s side. With his inactivity and dogmatism of the old schemes he loses the initiative and control to Russia. At last, Russia came to realize that it would not place Belarus under its control quickly. That’s why Medvedev and Putin will be patiently waiting until the Belarusian economic “miracle” declines. However, they haven’t decided yet  what to do then.

June 26, 2008




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Expert forum
THE NEW RUSSIAN PRESIDENT AND BELARUS: SLUGGISH POLITICAL EMANCIPATION, ACTIVE ECONOMIC EXPANSION?

BELARUSIAN INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES, NASHA NIVA WEEKLY, MINSK

26.06.2008

Presidential elections in Russia have been an event of international importance. A succession scenario had been implemented, although the former President, Vladimir Putin, still controls power being the Prime-Minister and the leader of the largest faction in the State Duma. What does this mean for Belarus?


NEW ROUND OF THE MINSK-MOSCOW GAS RAW

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

02.08.2007

It is hard for Belarus to appeal to Europe as one of the potential affected parties in the gas conflict between Minsk and Moscow. Earlier this leverage could be effective, but now it is restricted and will not be decisive for the Russian company Gazprom.


DOES BELARUS-RUSSIA UNION HAVE A FUTURE?

VALERY FEDOROV, VLADIMIR PETUKHOV

19.02.2007

Intricate integration processes are taking place in the former Soviet Union. And there is a danger that as time goes by and new generation grows up, it will become more and more difficult to solve the problems of reintegration in the post-Soviet space.


BELARUS-RUSSIA: OIL AND GAS MADNESS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

11.01.2007

The oil conflict showed the extreme weakness of the regulatory framework of the bilateral relations between Belarus and Russia, lack of legal culture, and powerful potential for conflicts development.


RUSSIAN - BELARUSIAN RELATIONS: ENERGY WAR

ALEKSANDER FADEEV

11.01.2007

At present I would not say that Belarus’ lifting duties on the Russian oil transit to Europe gives evidence of a compromise between Moscow and Minsk.


PROSPECTS FOR THE BELARUS-RUSSIA RELATIONS

OLEG MANAEV

18.12.2006

The recent visit of Belarusian President Aliaksandr Lukashenka to Russia (December 15) shows that Moscow continues with its putting pressure on him. The main objective of the Kremlin officials is to strengthen Russia’s control over Belarus and its economy.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE FUTURE OF THE UNION STATE

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

14.12.2006

Belarus-Russia Union State has never existed. Since 2002 the Union State bodies have not made any important decisions, they have not achieved any serious breakthroughs.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

05.12.2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has concentrated all Belarusian diplomacy and Belarus’ foreign policy on Russia. For the last 10 years Minsk has conducted explicitly unilateral foreign policy in order to win Moscow’s favor.


THE BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

15.06.2006

The issue of Gazprom’s gas price increase for Belarus has found a lodgment in the agenda of the Belarusian-Russian relations. Still, serious tensions have not yet emerged.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

ANDREY KAZAKEVICH

15.05.2006

The fact, that right after the presidential elections in Belarus the Kremlin has stated that the gas prices will be raised for Minsk, is quite explainable.


GAS PRICES FOR BELARUS TO GO UP

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

31.03.2006

I believe that the myth of the Belarus-Russia Union is being destroyed, and the current scheme which was employed by Russia on drafting an agreement with Belarus about gas cooperation is nearing its end as well.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: ECONOMIC COOPERATION

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

29.03.2006

If to judge about the Belarusian-Russian relations just by the crude figures of the Belarus’ trade balance, the two countries are definitely at a trade war.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

02.02.2006

Regardless all Moscow and Minsk’s assurances about mutual understanding, progress and relationships improvement, the course of discussion and passing of the most important documents do show that the integration between Belarus and Russia remains on paper.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK

13.09.2005

Lukashenka is aware of the fact that the Kremlin officials discuss various scenarios of Russia’s reaction to the upcoming political events in Belarus.



Analysis

21.03.2008

POWER POKER: AN EXAMINATION INTO THE DYNAMICS OF THE CURRENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RUSSIA AND BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes the Belarus Brief  "Power Poker: An Examination into the Dynamics of the Current Relationship between Russia and Belarus" by Andrei Liakhovich, Center for Political Education, Minsk.


09.10.2007

TOWARDS A NEW VISION OF BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS) publishes synopsis of the international conference "Towards a New Vision of Belarus" which was held on September 10-12 in Kyiv, Ukraine.


29.09.2007

BELARUS BRIEF: COSMETIC SURGERY IN BELARUS: TOWARD A NEW REGIME

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis entitled "Cosmetic Surgery in Belarus: Toward a New Regime". In the light of the EU-Russia summit, the analysis offers a new look to the most important post-election development of Belarus.


22.12.2006

BELARUS BRIEF: HOW THE WEST CONTINUES TO LOSE BELARUS

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes the Belarus Brief "How the West continues to lose Belarus" on the current situation in Belarus and outlining possible scenarios for the 2007 year.


26.05.2006

BELARUS BRIEF: STATE OF THE UNION AND THE UNION STATE

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis entitled “State of the Union and the Union State”. In the light of the EU-Russia summit, the analysis offers a new look to the most important post-election development of Belarus.


14.04.2006

BELARUS AFTER ELECTION: THE NAKED DICTATOR

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of the Pontis Foundation publishes analysis prepared by the Minsk-based Center for Political Education entitled “Belarus after Election: The Naked Dictator”.  The analysis summaries the March events, draws conclusions from the reaction of authorities and the opposition and outlines the possible development for Belarus for the beginning of the third term of Alexander Lukashenka.



Author’s opinion on other topics

“THE CUSTOMS UNION MAY BE THE LAST EFFORT OF RUSSIA TO KEEP THE CIS COUNTRIES TOGETHER”

02 December 2009

The documents establishing the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia were signed on November 27, 2009 in Minsk by Aliaksandr Lukashenka, Nursultan Nazarbayev and Dmitry Medvedev.


RUSSIAN-BELARUSIAN RELATIONS AND THE CHISINAU CIS SUMMIT

08 October 2009

President of Belarus, Aliaksandr Lukashenka’s uncomplimentary words about the Russian-Belarusian relations and about Russian Premier Vladimir Putin personally have little to do with transformation of the CIS whose leaders will hold the summit in the Moldovan capital of Chisinau on October 9.


HOW BELARUSIANS ASSESS CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA

23 June 2009

According to the public opinion polls, 90% of the Belarusians have considered Russia a friendly state. At present this figure can fall to 70%, this is the maximum, to which the national mass media criticism can lead.


BELARUS DURING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS

25 December 2008

The policy followed by the Belarusian authorities during the financial and economic crisis confirms the axiom of the economic influence on the politics. In Belarus the economic situation exerts considerable influence upon the politics.


BELARUS-RUSSIA: OIL AND GAS MADNESS

11 January 2007

The oil conflict showed the extreme weakness of the regulatory framework of the bilateral relations between Belarus and Russia, lack of legal culture, and powerful potential for conflicts development.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

05 December 2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has concentrated all Belarusian diplomacy and Belarus’ foreign policy on Russia. For the last 10 years Minsk has conducted explicitly unilateral foreign policy in order to win Moscow’s favor.


THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES: FIFTEENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ORGANIZATION

20 October 2006

If Vladimir Putin and Nursultan Nazarbayev don’t want to be remembered as political leaders of the high oil prices epoch they will come forward with a CIS reform that would be equal to creating new organization with real obligations of all the parties.


VISIT OF PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA HUGO CHAVEZ TO BELARUS

28 July 2006

Globalization influences not only the markets of goods, services and money. The authoritarian and dictatorial regimes have long been reaping fruits of the globalization, severely criticizing its major initiators, the USA being on top of the list.


THE BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

15 June 2006

The issue of Gazprom’s gas price increase for Belarus has found a lodgment in the agenda of the Belarusian-Russian relations. Still, serious tensions have not yet emerged.


GAS PRICES FOR BELARUS TO GO UP

31 March 2006

I believe that the myth of the Belarus-Russia Union is being destroyed, and the current scheme which was employed by Russia on drafting an agreement with Belarus about gas cooperation is nearing its end as well.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: ECONOMIC COOPERATION

29 March 2006

If to judge about the Belarusian-Russian relations just by the crude figures of the Belarus’ trade balance, the two countries are definitely at a trade war.


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN BELARUS

23 March 2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has done his utmost to show Belarus and the world community that he is the only and indisputable leader of the country.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION

02 February 2006

Regardless all Moscow and Minsk’s assurances about mutual understanding, progress and relationships improvement, the course of discussion and passing of the most important documents do show that the integration between Belarus and Russia remains on paper.


POLITICAL SITUATION IN BELARUS BEFORE THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN

27 December 2005

The decision to hold presidential elections on March 19, 2006 was not a surprise for the Belarusian opposition. It was one of the predictable case scenarios, which depended on the development of relations between Minsk and Moscow . Aliaksandr Lukashenka could not be luckier. Being an experienced politician, he turned gas conflict between Russia and Ukraine to his advantage.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS AND THE PROSPECTS OF THE BELARUSIAN OPPOSITION

21 November 2005

The format of meetings is usually determined by two parties. Since Aliaksandr Milinkevich needs publicity (he needs to introduce himself, promote his team and his election program), it was definitely the Russian party, who had chosen not to advertise his visit. And it is logical. Firstly, it was the first high-level meeting of the Belarusian presidential candidate from democratic forces with the Russian policymakers.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS

13 September 2005

Lukashenka is aware of the fact that the Kremlin officials discuss various scenarios of Russia’s reaction to the upcoming political events in Belarus.


A VISIT OF ALIAKSANDR LUKASHENKA TO MOSCOW

27 July 2005

Judging by the results, all the previous meetings of the Russian and Belarusian Presidents were formal rather than of fundamental importance.


UKRAINE — EU RELATIONS

27 June 2005

The EU has refused to give Ukraine the status of a country with market economy. At the same time, the European Union officials made the decision to simplify the visa regime for the Ukrainian citizens. Why did Ukraine fail to obtain the status? The Belarusian economist Yaroslav ROMANCHUK answered this question.

 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation