Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


BELARUS – RUSSIA: ECONOMIC COOPERATION

Print version

YAROSLAV ROMANCHUK,
President of the Minsk-based Mizes Center

RUSSIA’S FAILURE: THE UNDECLARED WAR

If to judge about the Belarusian-Russian relations just by the crude figures of the Belarus’ trade balance, the two countries are definitely at a trade war. At the forefront is the commodity exchange between Moscow and Belarus. Belarus has lost 49.7 % of the trade turnover with the Russian capital which is the most dynamically growing and the richest Russia’s market. On the whole, in 2005 in value terms the trade turnover between Belarus and Russia decreased by 10.7%, in physical terms the exports lessened by 10.9%, the imports – by 12.9%. The friendship with Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov (during his visit to Minsk before the elections, he stated that the commodity turnover growth between Belarus and Moscow to be $7 billion, which differed by $4 billion from the real sum), the Russian military officials, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexius ll, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the State Duma faction of the United Russia headed by Boris Gryzlov has become useful for the fuel and energy complex of Belarus and Russia, but counterproductive for the majority of entrepreneurs and the small business of the both countries.

 Frightening failure

Of all ten commodity item positions of Belarus’ exports to Russia there’s been a decrease in all ten. In 2004 the oil products exports skyrocketed, but in 2005 the Russian market nosedived as fast as it had been developing in the previous 12 months. In value terms the supply volume decreased by 74%. Such instability is caused by the legislative pandemonium and the fact that this segment of market has no set rules of the game.

Textiles and related goods are the second commodity group in terms of the drop speed. The Belarusian light industry sold Russia its products by 18.7% less than in 2004 in value terms. Textiles are followed by the chemicals and non-precious metals. It should be noted that according to those commodity groups the rate of decrease in imports to Belarus was much higher: chemicals – minus 23.8%, non-precious metals – minus 27.9%. In spite of the forthcoming 10-year anniversary of the Belarus – Russia Union, the trade relations between Belarus and Russia are far from being stable and predictable as they are declared to be. They are strongly dependent on the political decisions made by the authorities, but, evidently, the latter do not welcome the free trade regime between the countries.

The other Belarusian goods, the Russians have lost their interest in, include footwear (shrinkage of exports by 30.3%), the parts of cars, tractors (by 27.5%), television sets (by 24.5%). Also, Belarus has reduced the number of car and tractor parts (by 2.6 times), electrical accumulators (by 11 times), insulated wires and cables (by 2.1 times), plastics and their products (by 42.7%), paper and cardboard (by 30.7%), ferrous metals and related products (by 21.9) purchased in Russia.

The year of 2005 was successful for the Belarusian meat exporters. In value and physical terms, the export of fresh and frozen beef, pork and sausages increased. The dairy products manufacturers worked effectively. In value terms the export of different dairy products increased by 30-35%. The Russians have bought more of the Belarusian cheese, cottage cheese, sugar and even tinned fish. Against a background of dramatic growth in sugar exports (by 28.9% in physical terms, 31% in value terms) the year was unsuccessful for the chocolate manufacturers (shrinkage of exports by 36.2% in value terms) as well as for confectionery manufacturers (decrease in exports by 28.6%).

The strong positions of the Belarusian manufacturers of corset products in the Russian market were shaken in 2005. In physical terms the corset products exports to Russia increased by 12.1%, but in value terms the exports decreased by 2.9%. The year of 2005 was not very successful for the Belarusian timber processors. The exports of raw timbers decreased by 31.2%. The volume of supply of fiberboards, wood-particle boards and wood construction materials lessened. In value terms the furniture supplies lessened by 12.6%.

The leaders of the Belarusian industry suffered. In spite of the fact that in physical terms the fridge exports increased by 2.6 thousand (up to 683.7 thousand), in value terms it decreased by 13.2%. The television sets exports failed in physical volumes of supplies and in value terms: Belarus sold 65.8 thousand pieces less, which resulted in the gain decrease by 24.5%.

The hosiery market witnesses the competition growth. The physical values of the hosiery exports decreased by 7%. The situation with leather footwear is still more critical. In physical terms the exports decreased by 17.6%, in value terms – by 27.6%. If to carefully analyze the trade balance between Russia and Belarus in recent years, it is very difficult to find commodity items (gas and oil not included) that would have a stable tendency towards growth. The trade is developing in spite of, rather than thanks to, the Russian-Belarusian agreements, protocols and treaties that are signed regularly. 

Structural changes 

In 2005 the process of the structural changes in the trade relations between Belarus and Russia became much more intense. The mineral commodities percentage in Belarus’ import from Russia increased from 40.6% in 2004 to 54.9% in 2005. At the same time, the other goods percentage plummeted: machinery and equipment – from 12.5% in 2004 to 7.7% in 2005, non-precious metals and related products – from 16.4% to 13%, finished foodstuffs – from 3.8% to 3.3%, textiles – from 2.6% to 1.5%. Belarus is fencing itself off from Russia on virtually all “commodity fronts”, but demands to keep for itself the Russian gas prices and extremely profitable schemes of oil processing. Such behavior is unlikely to be characterized as that of a partner. Since the oil and gas flows and their prices issues have not been clarified in 2005, it is possible to suppose that the structural revolution in the trade between Belarus and Russia in 2005 would not be the last one.

We face a very unpleasant tug-of-war when Russia manufactures the goods, which would directly compete with big Belarusian enterprises (tractors, trucks, fridges, television sets, chemical products). Then, within the WTO and bilateral treaties signed, Russia will demand to provide it an equal access to the Belarusian market. If to take into consideration a much significant tax burden, lower energy prices and using of state-of-the-art technologies, Russia will become the most threatening competitor for the Belarusian enterprises.

Strong energy dependency 

The dependency on the Russian energy has relaxed the Belarusian manufacturers. The government protectionism allowed them to be relaxed to an even greater degree. The Directorate focused on achievement of forecasts about the GDP, not on the enterprises capitalization and cost saving. In an environment where the mild monetary and fiscal policy was being pursued, this was much easier than to modernize the basic capital and to find a way to access the rich countries markets.

The disquieting fact is that the crisis of the trade with Russia will certainly lead to the general crisis of the country’s foreign trade, and, as a result, to the recession of Belarus’ real economy. Up to now the lion’s share of the consumer goods export has gone to Russia. Over 98% - meat and meat products, 97.7% - milk and dairy products, 100% - sugar, 61.8% - medicines, 73.5% - wall-papers, 88% - footwear, 81% - fridges, 63% - metalworking machine-tools, 65% - television sets, 39% - tractors, 76% - truck tractors, 70% - furniture. The Belarusian authorities had been engaged in the discussion of the constitutional act, single currency and Slavic friendship to such a large degree, that they missed worsening of the trade and macroeconomic relations between Russia and Belarus. The negative trends in the Belarusian-Russian trade, which gathered momentum in 2005, will certainly tell on Belarusian economy for the next five-year period.

 Trade between Belarus and Russia, 2002 – 2005, USD million

Goods

Exports

2005 to 2004 %

Imports

2005 to 2004 %

 

2002

2003

2004

2005

2002

2003

2004

2005

Total

3977

4899

6463

5714

-11,9

5922

7559

11143

10094

-10

Mineral products

50

68.1

294.7

76

-74

2308

3004

4519

5545

22.7

Machinery, equipment

776

955

1210

1060

-12.4

652.3

887.1

1388

779

-43.8

Chemical products

169

206

180.5

156

-13.6

338.3

396.2

528.6

403

-23.8

Ferrous metal products

152.4

198

263

246

-6.5

182

228.6

401

265

-33.9

Finished foodstuffs

269.4

317.8

437.7

414

-5.4

319.4

398

429

332

-22.6

Textiles and related products

444.9

507.6

593.2

482

-18.7

185

220.8

289.8

150

-48.2

Surface transport

711.2

795.5

1110

1028

-7.4

173.4

201.9

326.9

249

-23.8

Non-precious metals and related products

323

489

645

561

-13

818

1099

1831

1320

-27.9

Plastics, caoutchouc, rubber products

237

271

340

317

-6.8

274

361

583

367

-37

                                         Source: The Ministry of Statistics and Analysis of the Republic of Belarus, 2003 – 2006

 

Trade between Belarus and Russia’s regions, USD million

Region

2003

2004

2005

2005 to2004  %

The region’s share in total exports and imports with Russia in 2005

Russia, turnover

12458

17704

15808

-10.7

 

Exports

4899

6485

5714

-11.9

 

Imports

7559

11219

10094

-10

 

1. Tyumenregion

2371

3831

4838

26.3

30.6

Exports

25

40

33

-17.5

0.6

Imports

2345

3791

4805

26.7

47.8

2. Moscow

4621

6150

3054

-49.7

19.3

Exports

2045

2441

1940

-20.5

34

Imports

2576

3709

1115

-69.9

11

3. Moscowregion

628

988

995

0.7

6.3

Exports

422

653

592

-9.3

10.4

Imports

205

336

402

19.6

4

4. St. Petersburg 

581

767

733

-4.4

4.6

Exports

365

486

471

-3

8.2

Imports

216

281

263

-6.4

2.6

5. Perm region

281

480

544

13.3

3.4

Exports

28

36

34

-5.6

0.6

Imports

253

444

509

14.6

5

6. Smolemskregion

408

561

467

-16.8

3

Exports

229

317

250

-21.1

4.4

Imports

179

244

217

-11

2.1

7. Tatsratan

338

383

340

-11.2

2.2

Exports

109

177

182

2.8

3.2

Imports

229

206

158

-23.3

1.6

8. Nizhny Novgorod region 

180

261

267

2.3

1.7

Exports

101

128

137

7

2.4

Imports

79

133

131

1.5

1.3

9. Vologdaregion

108

222

257

15.8

1.6

Exports

35

100

73

-27

1.3

Imports

73

122

184

50.8

1.8

10. Yaroslavlregion

205

266

254

-4.5

1.6

Exports

78

87

74

-14.9

1.3

Imports

128

179

180

0.6

1.8

                                          Source: The Ministry of Statistics and Analysis of the Republic of Belarus, 2003 - 2006

 

Leading trade partners of Belarus, 2002 – 2005

Country

Exports (%)

Imports (%)

 

2002

2003

2004

2005

2002

2003

2004

2005

Total volume,   USD million

8098

9946

13752

15977

8980

11558

16345

16699

Russia

50.1

49.2

47

35.8

65.1

65.7

68.2

60.4

Ukraine

3.4

3.4

3.9

5.7

3.2

3.1

3.3

5.4

Germany

4.3

4.2

3.7

4.4

7.7

7.1

6.6

6.7

Poland

3.4

4.4

5.3

5.3

2.4

3

2.9

3.5

Latvia

6.4

3.5

2.4

2

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.5

Lithuania

3.2

2.7

2.6

2.2

1.2

1.3

1.1

0.8

CIS

55

54.7

53.1

43

69.2

69.6

72.2

66.3

China

2.7

1.6

2.2

2.7

0.5

0.6

1

1.7

EU

28*

32.5*

36.7

44.1

17*

18*

19.8

21.4

the Netherlands

3.4

4.2

6.7

15

0.9

0.8

0.7

1

Great Britain

6.1

9.4

8.3

7

0.8

0.7

0.8

0.9

 

 

 




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Author’s opinion on other topics

“THE CUSTOMS UNION MAY BE THE LAST EFFORT OF RUSSIA TO KEEP THE CIS COUNTRIES TOGETHER”

02 December 2009

The documents establishing the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia were signed on November 27, 2009 in Minsk by Aliaksandr Lukashenka, Nursultan Nazarbayev and Dmitry Medvedev.


RUSSIAN-BELARUSIAN RELATIONS AND THE CHISINAU CIS SUMMIT

08 October 2009

President of Belarus, Aliaksandr Lukashenka’s uncomplimentary words about the Russian-Belarusian relations and about Russian Premier Vladimir Putin personally have little to do with transformation of the CIS whose leaders will hold the summit in the Moldovan capital of Chisinau on October 9.


HOW BELARUSIANS ASSESS CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA

23 June 2009

According to the public opinion polls, 90% of the Belarusians have considered Russia a friendly state. At present this figure can fall to 70%, this is the maximum, to which the national mass media criticism can lead.


BELARUS DURING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS

25 December 2008

The policy followed by the Belarusian authorities during the financial and economic crisis confirms the axiom of the economic influence on the politics. In Belarus the economic situation exerts considerable influence upon the politics.


INTEGRATION IMITATION WILL CONTINUE. DMITRY MEDVEDEV AND VLADIMIR PUTIN’S TACTICS AGAINST ALIAKSANDR LUKASHENKA

26 June 2008

Moscow’s main aim is to stop the parasitical relations with Lukashenka's regime without serious damage to the cooperation, and to establish friendly but, at the same time, pragmatic relations with the Belarusian state, which let the Kremlin keep Minsk in Russia’s sphere of influence.


BELARUS-RUSSIA: OIL AND GAS MADNESS

11 January 2007

The oil conflict showed the extreme weakness of the regulatory framework of the bilateral relations between Belarus and Russia, lack of legal culture, and powerful potential for conflicts development.


BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

05 December 2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has concentrated all Belarusian diplomacy and Belarus’ foreign policy on Russia. For the last 10 years Minsk has conducted explicitly unilateral foreign policy in order to win Moscow’s favor.


THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES: FIFTEENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ORGANIZATION

20 October 2006

If Vladimir Putin and Nursultan Nazarbayev don’t want to be remembered as political leaders of the high oil prices epoch they will come forward with a CIS reform that would be equal to creating new organization with real obligations of all the parties.


VISIT OF PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA HUGO CHAVEZ TO BELARUS

28 July 2006

Globalization influences not only the markets of goods, services and money. The authoritarian and dictatorial regimes have long been reaping fruits of the globalization, severely criticizing its major initiators, the USA being on top of the list.


THE BELARUSIAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

15 June 2006

The issue of Gazprom’s gas price increase for Belarus has found a lodgment in the agenda of the Belarusian-Russian relations. Still, serious tensions have not yet emerged.


GAS PRICES FOR BELARUS TO GO UP

31 March 2006

I believe that the myth of the Belarus-Russia Union is being destroyed, and the current scheme which was employed by Russia on drafting an agreement with Belarus about gas cooperation is nearing its end as well.


PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN BELARUS

23 March 2006

Aliaksandr Lukashenka has done his utmost to show Belarus and the world community that he is the only and indisputable leader of the country.


BELARUS – RUSSIA: THE PROSPECTS OF INTEGRATION

02 February 2006

Regardless all Moscow and Minsk’s assurances about mutual understanding, progress and relationships improvement, the course of discussion and passing of the most important documents do show that the integration between Belarus and Russia remains on paper.


POLITICAL SITUATION IN BELARUS BEFORE THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN

27 December 2005

The decision to hold presidential elections on March 19, 2006 was not a surprise for the Belarusian opposition. It was one of the predictable case scenarios, which depended on the development of relations between Minsk and Moscow . Aliaksandr Lukashenka could not be luckier. Being an experienced politician, he turned gas conflict between Russia and Ukraine to his advantage.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS AND THE PROSPECTS OF THE BELARUSIAN OPPOSITION

21 November 2005

The format of meetings is usually determined by two parties. Since Aliaksandr Milinkevich needs publicity (he needs to introduce himself, promote his team and his election program), it was definitely the Russian party, who had chosen not to advertise his visit. And it is logical. Firstly, it was the first high-level meeting of the Belarusian presidential candidate from democratic forces with the Russian policymakers.


BELARUSIAN - RUSSIAN RELATIONS

13 September 2005

Lukashenka is aware of the fact that the Kremlin officials discuss various scenarios of Russia’s reaction to the upcoming political events in Belarus.


A VISIT OF ALIAKSANDR LUKASHENKA TO MOSCOW

27 July 2005

Judging by the results, all the previous meetings of the Russian and Belarusian Presidents were formal rather than of fundamental importance.


UKRAINE — EU RELATIONS

27 June 2005

The EU has refused to give Ukraine the status of a country with market economy. At the same time, the European Union officials made the decision to simplify the visa regime for the Ukrainian citizens. Why did Ukraine fail to obtain the status? The Belarusian economist Yaroslav ROMANCHUK answered this question.

 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation