Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


USIP: AMERICA'S STRATEGIC BLUNDER IN GEORGIA AND THE DEATH OF THE ROSE REVOLUTION

Print version

What began on August 7 as a reckless act of aggression by Georgia to bludgeon the separatist province of South Ossetia into submission, quickly escalated to Russian military intervention in Georgia, and the conflict's transformation into a proxy war between the U.S. and Moscow. What's at stake in this conflict is not Georgia's sovereignty or that of its breakaway provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazi, but NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders. The short-hot war in Georgia was Russia's red line in the sand signaling to the U.S., Western Europe and its former Soviet republics that the strategic military encirclement of Russia stops here

The Bush Administration, aided by a complicit Democratic Party Congress made a monumental strategic error in pushing NATO membership for Georgia at the last alliance summit. Coming on the heals of American sponsorship of Kosovo's independence, Bush's action could only be seen as a provocation. That Bush blatantly antagonized Moscow with no intention of defending Georgia if attacked by Russia constituted the height of irresponsibility. The U.S. financed, armed and trained the Georgian army, led by the political neophyte President Saakashvili. Yet despite explicit warnings from Bush and Sec. of State Rice that Georgia not attack its separatist provinces, Saskshvili couldn't restrain his propensity for committing atrocities against South Ossetia-thus provoking Russia to arms.  

Had France and Germany not resisted Bush's imprimatur for Georgian inclusion in NATO, the U.S. and Western Europe would at this moment be legally obliged to attack Russian forces in Georgia. Coming at a time when the 26 nation NATO Alliance can't ante up enough troops to defeat the resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan, NATO would have undoubtedly split over an armed intervention to confront Russia on Georgian soil. Once again, this comedy of errors so typical of the Bush administration's reckless foreign policy has undermined U.S.-European Union relations and pushed U.S. - Russian relations to a breaking point. 

For all President Bush's rhetoric about punishing the Russians, little if anything will be done in his last five months in office. The U.S. still needs Russia as a partner to check Iran's nuclear program, police loose nukes and proliferation, not to mention assisting the West in the "war on terror." For its part, Russia has long since left the West, and while it may cooperate in these areas based on its own national interest, Russia increasingly regards the U.S. as a hostile adversary and will act accordingly.

Going forward Moscow's political and military posture will become much more aggressive in what it calls its "Near Abroad." Russia's harsh warnings to Poland for accepting U.S. missile interceptors and the Ukraine over naval access agreements to Black Sea ports are illustrative of growing tensions between Moscow and the West. Russia will also attempt to accelerate its growing anti-U.S. energy alliance with China in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea basin to push back U.S. moves to consolidate access to energy resources.

While the media speculates about the resumption of the Cold War between the U.S. and Russia, the larger issue at hand is the growing potential for a new geo-political divide whose footprint is slowly but surely being called into existence; A new East-West energy divide that begins in the Middle East with Syria, Iraq and Iran and sweeps eastward through Russia and China, with an ambivalent India wedged in the middle. In the 21st Century "Great Game" in Central Asia, three countries share the majority of the region's energy resources, namely Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

The essence of U.S-Russian geo-political contention in Central Asia is twofold: first, control of production of the oil and gas, and second, control of the pipelines which will transfer the oil to the Western markets. It is not insignificant in the grand scheme of the conflict in Georgia that three oil pipelines run through Georgia to the West, all circumventing Russia.  

Ultimately, the Georgian crisis will be resolved in the short-run with face saving measures that mollify all sides. Russians troops will remain in South Ossetia and Abkhazia at pre-crisis levels as outlined in the French brokered cease fire agreement. Both provinces will formally remain autonomous regions of Georgia, although Moscow will exert greater political, economic and military leverage. Georgia's prospects of gaining entry into NATO are all but dead in the foreseeable future. The fragrant blooms of Georgia's Rose Revolution have fallen, leaving only the painful thorns of a divided and war-torn country trapped between the imperial ambitions of Moscow and the West.  

Webster BROOKS, Editor of the U.S. Iran Peace Project website

U.S. - Iran Peace Project, August 18, 2008




Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

28.07.2008

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: GEORGIA GEARING UP FOR “IMMEDIATE RESPONSE”, RUSSIA FLEXING MUSCLES WITH “CAUCASUS FRONTIER 2008”

1,625 Georgian military servicemen are taking part in a large-scale international military training, alongside US forces, known as Immediate Response at the site of the fourth infantry brigade of Vaziani base.

27.06.2008

RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS: OPTIONS FOR THE EU-RUSSIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The 10-year Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Russian Federation and the European Union, which served to deepen and broaden relations between the parties, expired on November 30, 2007.

14.04.2008

RFE/RL: NATO: KYIV, TBILISI FACE MORE OBSTACLES THAN SIMPLY RUSSIAN RESISTANCE

Days before the NATO summit in Bucharest began, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili rolled out a new peace initiative for breakaway Abkhazia.

07.04.2008

RFE/RL: U.S./RUSSIA: FRIENDLY WORDS, BUT BUSH AND PUTIN FAIL TO RESOLVE DISPUTES

Setting aside growing tension on a number of issues, Putin and Bush appeared eager to end their presidential relationship on a high note.

03.04.2008

RFE/RL: NATO WELCOMES CROATIA, ALBANIA, BUT ASKS UKRAINE, GEORGIA, MACEDONIA TO WAIT

Speaking today at NATO's summit in Bucharest, Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said the alliance wants to welcome Ukraine and Georgia as members someday.

27.02.2008

CIVIL GEORGIA: GEORGIAN, RUSSIAN MINISTERS ON PUTIN-SAAKASHVILI TALKS

Davit Bakradze, the Georgian foreign minister: “As a result of an agreement between the presidents, [direct] air traffic will be resumed between Russia and Georgia in the nearest future, it is expected that flights will resume from the second half of March.”

25.12.2007

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: WITH OR WITHOUT RUSSIA?

The foreign policy priorities of the presidential candidates. Most put Euro-Atlantic and NATO integration front and center, but good relations with Russia is, for some, another major consideration.

16.12.2007

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: NATIONAL VOTE: SHOULD GEORGIA BECOME A MEMBER OF NATO?

Georgian voters will have to answer a question if Georgia should become a member of NATO at the January 5th plebiscite, which will be held alongside the presidential poll.

01.11.2007

RFE/RL: GEORGIA SEEKS END TO RUSSIAN PEACEKEEPERS’ MANDATE IN ABKHAZIA

Georgia says it will move to formally ask Russian peacekeepers to leave the breakaway region of Abkhazia following reports that they seized and beat five Georgian police officers.

12.10.2007

RFE/RL: EU MAKING ITS VOICE HEARD IN MOSCOW'S BACKYARD

What Europe does want to do is to support democratic reforms in former Soviet states like Georgia and Ukraine, and push for change in autocracies like Belarus.

09.10.2007

RFE/RL: FRANCE'S SARKOZY TAKES CRITICAL STAND ON FIRST TRIP TO MOSCOW

Far from offering the warm embrace shown Moscow by his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, the 52-year-old Sarkozy has been nothing short of blunt in expressing his views on Russia.

17.07.2007

CAUCAZ.COM: “THE PRESENT SITUATION CONCERNING THE SOUTH CAUCASUS CONFLICTS CANNOT GO ON FOREVER, THERE MUST BE SOME MOVEMENT.”

Interview with Ambassador Per Eklund, Head of Delegation of the European Commission to Georgia and Armenia.

24.04.2007

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: WILL NATO INTEGRATION HELP ENSURE OR RISK GEORGIA’S SECURITY? POLISH EXPERIENCE AND PUBLIC OPINION

Interview with Jaroslaw Walesa, the member of parliament of Poland.

15.03.2007

RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS: THE STRATEGIC DILEMMA OF CENTRAL ASIA

Tashkent is now facing a difficult geopolitical dilemma: which force should it rely on? Uzbekistan’s strategic partnerships with the United States and Russia are acquiring special importance under these conditions.


Expert forum
SUMMING UP THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON GEORGIA

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

25.07.2008

I believe that the withdrawal of the Russian railroad troops from Abkhazia and the UN Security Council meeting, which was held on July 21 at Georgia’s request, cannot be directly linked to each other. 


DETERIORATION OF THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS

ALEXANDER RONDELI

23.07.2008

I do not think there is a relation between the UN Security Council meeting where the Russian fighter jets’ violations of the Georgian airspace were discussed and the withdrawal of the Russian railroad troops from Abkhazia.


“SEA BREEZE-2008” AND PROSPECTS OF UKRAINE’S JOINING NATO

VITALY PORTNIKOV

22.07.2008

The holding of “Sea Breeze” military exercises and Ukraine’s joining NATO should be regarded as two different processes. Some people want to unite them, but Kyiv has not applied for the NATO membership yet. Ukraine has not received the NATO Membership Action Plan and, apparently, will not recieve it in December.


SITUATION IN ABKHAZIA

SERGEI BAGAPSH

22.05.2008

What will Abkhazia do, if Georgia joins NATO? Abkhazia will do nothing. Let Georgia join NATO even tomorrow. We do not care about that.


“RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS CAN BECOME MUCH BETTER”

EROSI KITSMARISHVILI

21.05.2008

Currently, there are several negative points in the Russian-Georgian relations. The first one is Georgia’s bid for the NATO membership, the second one is Tbilisi’s conflict with the breakaway territories – Abkhazia and South Ossetia. There are also the problems of the bilateral relations.


RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS AND WAYS TO SETTLE THE GEORGIAN-ABKHAZIAN CONFLICT

TEMUR IAKOBASHVILI

21.05.2008

It is impossible to settle the conflicts, on which I am working, without Russia’s participation, especially today when the situation has become so strained that the so-called "frozen conflicts" have got "unfrozen".


THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

25.04.2008

Almost all significant political forces in Georgia, including the ruling party, say that there are sufficient reasons for making the compromises with Russia that would not infringe upon Georgia’s national interests.


DOES NATO ENLARGEMENT POSE A THREAT TO RUSSIA?

KONSTANTIN ZATULIN, ALEXANDER KONOVALOV, TATYANA PARKHALINA, OLES DONIY, LEONID KOZHARA, IVAN ZAETS, ANDREW KUCHINS

07.04.2008

"Why do the Central and Eastern European countries seek to join NATO? For many of them it is a way to join the EU. Many countries took this as institutionalization of independence from Moscow. For many countries it was a way to return to Europe," Tatyana Parkhalina.


NATO, THE CIS AND RUSSIA AFTER BUCHAREST

STEPHEN BLANK

02.04.2008

In advance of NATO’s Bucharest summit Russia has decided to employ the traditional Soviet tactics of intimidation and blackmail to block NATO’s enlargement.


WILL THE POST-SOVIET BREAKAWAY REGIONS BE RECOGNIZED?

DMITRY MEDOEV, GURAM GUMBA, SERGEI ARUTYUNOV, SERGEI MARKEDONOV

19.03.2008

"If to look at a map, one can realize that in the event of the conflict in Abkhazia the Georgian party is doomed to defeat, as has happened before. This is why Abkhazia has a very good chance of becoming independent," Sergei Arutyunov.


MIKHEIL SAAKASHVILI’S FIRST VISIT AS PRESIDENT WAS TO MOSCOW NOT WASHINGTON

GIGA BOKERIA

23.11.2007

No democratic Georgian government will ever agree with Abkhazia’s independence, because in this territory a few people with the assistance of the large neighboring state and the military aggressively hoisted the flag of ethnic nationalism.


NEW BIG GAME IN CENTRAL ASIA

ANDREY GROZIN

14.11.2007

At present the West has better attitude towards Turkmenistan than it did under former President Saparmurat Niyazov, although since he died, the regime has hardly changed. This shows once more that oil and gas are more important than democracy. 

FRENCH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS

ALEKSANDR RAHR

12.10.2007

The economic interests prompt Nicolas Sarkozy to get to the Russian market. The French big business and, first and foremost, state corporations urge the President to do so.   

SOUTH OSSETIA STATUS: LOOKING FOR A NEW APPROACH

GHIA NODIA

26.07.2007

On July 24 Tbilisi hosted the first meeting of the State Committee on the status of South Ossetia. The Committee is intended to work out an approach to resolving the argument about South Ossetia’s status that would be acceptable both to Georgia and South Ossetia. 


RUSSIA-WEST RELATIONS: A NEW EPOCH HAS COME

SERGEI KARAGANOV

11.07.2007

Сriticism towards Russia is not an attack, but a counterattack of a weakening West that defends its positions.


SOUTH OSSETIA’S CLONED SEPARATISM

OLEG FESENKO, VITALY KULIK

13.06.2007

Early in May the Tbilisi officials voiced that “it is necessary to carry on the political dialogue with the authorities of the Tskhinvali region”. But Mikheil Saakashvili’s government decided to negotiate with the “alternative President” of South Ossetia Dmitry Sanakoev, who is close to the Georgian government.


RESULTS OF THE RUSSIA – EU SUMMIT

ALEKSANDR RAHR

22.05.2007

As to the influence of the new French President upon the EU policy towards Russia, from now on Russia will have to consider the EU's opinion.


GEORGIA – NATO: PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION

MERAB PACHULIA

09.03.2007

Ambitions of the Georgian authorities to develop cooperation with NATO are largely supported by the population. There is a consensus on the benefits that the country could receive after acquiring membership of the Alliance, though contradictions remain.


GEORGIA’S WAY TO NATO STREAMLINED

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

19.02.2007

Members of the “National Forum” and some other opposition parties fear that Georgia may join NATO without Abkhazia and South Ossetia, thus losing those territories for good.


ABKHAZIA APPEALS TO THE WORLD COMMUNITY FOR RECOGNITION OF ITS INDEPENDENCE

GHIA NODIA

06.12.2006

Abkhazia, an unrecognized republic of Georgia, held December 6 a “national gathering” to express its will to gain independence.


GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS ON ITS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE CIS

VLADIMIR ZHARIKHIN

04.05.2006

The economic preferences, which some of the CIS countries have due to the Russian authorities’ decision, such as gas delivery at a cut price, etc. have nothing to do with the CIS Charter.  It is a matter of the bilateral relations. 


RUSSIAN – EU RELATIONS

THIERRY DE MONTBRIAL

12.09.2005

Thierry de Montbrial, director of the French Institute of International Relations, is perhaps the best French expert on Russia and far from the last one in Europe. A talk with him enables one to get a clear idea of the current situation in Europe, which is being torn by disputes over its borders, asking the question, who, why and for what reason can be considered a European?


ABKHAZIA: NEW EASTERN POLICY

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

29.07.2005

The Georgian minister on conflict settlement, Giorgi Khaindrava, called the recent meeting between the leaders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia a "statehood game." While Georgian officials continue to describe political developments in the breakaway republics in this way, Abkhazia is taking a number of very important political steps that may give its cause a boost.


RUSSIA - EU RELATIONS

FYODOR LUKYANOV

04.07.2005

The Russian government’s refusal to invite the Presidents of Poland and Lithuania to celebrate a 750-year anniversary of Kaliningrad can be interpreted as Russia’s desire to show the new Europe that it has more important and influential friends in the EU. The leaders of Germany and France Gerhard Schroeder and Jacques Chirac were invited to the celebrations of Kaliningrad's 750th anniversary.


RUSSIA AND THE CAUCASUS REGION

ANATOLY BELIAYEV

22.06.2005

Predictably, BP Azerbaijan has said that it does not want to export oil produced in the Azerbaijani sector of the Caspian Sea via the Baku-Novorossiisk pipeline. This means that Russia, which is already losing its influence on the Caucasus, will suffer serious economic losses.


RUSSIAN - GEORGIAN RELATIONS

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

19.06.2005

Russia's relations with Georgia are one of the most cute and problematic aspects of foreign policy in the Caucasus. Previously "fraternal," i.e. former Soviet republic, Georgia has become one of Moscow's most intractable partners in the former Soviet space.


RUSSIA AND THE CAUCASUS REGION

VYACHESLAV IGRUNOV

17.06.2005

The agreements on the closure of Russian bases in Georgia, which were reached after dramatic negotiations and moves, have cast a fresh light on Russia's role and future in the Caucasus.


CAUCASUS IN THE GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

28.05.2005

The Russian military presence in Georgia has become the key issue of the Caucasian Big Game in the last few months. Discussions of the timeframe and speed of their withdrawal from Georgia overshadowed the problems of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.


CENTRAL ASIA IN THE GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

28.05.2005

Many people in Russia see America's presence in the post-Soviet (Eurasian) area as virtually an attempt to end Russia's national sovereignty. Alexander Dugin, a prominent theoretician of Russian traditionalism, recently said the United States was trying to penetrate the "canonical territory" of Russian diplomacy. However, the military-political presence of the world's No.1 superpower in some ex-Soviet republics might become an important stabilizing factor.



Analysis

24.07.2008

THE EVOLUTION OF RUSSIA’S CENTRAL ASIA POLICY

Eurasian Home with a kind permission of Defence Academy of the United Kingdom publishes an analytical report on Russia's policy in Central Asia, written by Vladimir Paramonov and Aleksey Strokov.



Opinion
BAD HABITS ARE CONTAGIOUS
Boris Kagarlitsky

14.08.2008

Georgia has resolutely condemned Russia’s actions in Chechnya. Russia has severely criticized NATO actions towards Serbia. Later on the Georgian authorities tried to do the same thing in South Ossetia as the Russian authorities had done in Chechnya. Moscow decided to treat Georgia in the same way as NATO had treated Serbia.


VICIOUS CIRCLE
Boris Kagarlitsky

17.07.2008

The Russian foreign policy boringly runs around in circles: the row with Estonia on the historic past, the squabbles between Moscow and Kyiv over the Crimea and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, the confrontation with Georgia because of its breakaway republics etc. After having made a full circle we are back to square one - another conflict with Georgia.


NATO EXPANSION – DON’T EXPECT THE RUSSIANS TO AGREE
John Marone

18.06.2008

If NATO can bring Ukrainians rule of law and a decent living standard, it would already have justified its expansion. But judging by the way other Western reforms have been perverted in Ukraine, one couldn’t be blamed for having serious doubts. Probably with more candidness, Mr. Yushchenko pointed out that Ukraine can join any international organization that it likes.


GEORGIA COULD BE OBSTREPEROUS OVER RUSSIA’S WTO BID
Jules Evans

20.11.2006

The Georgian government has apparently been offering olive branches to the Russian government over the last two weeks, with the demotion of hawkish defence minister Irakli Okruashvili to the ministry of economy (he’s since resigned).



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation