Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource



BORIS  KAGARLITSKY, MOSCOW
BAD HABITS ARE CONTAGIOUS

Print version               


Georgia has resolutely condemned Russia’s actions in Chechnya. Russia has severely criticized NATO actions towards Serbia.

Later on the Georgian authorities tried to do the same thing in South Ossetia as the Russian authorities had done in Chechnya. Moscow decided to treat Georgia in the same way as NATO had treated Serbia. Bad habits are contagious. Saying that after the Western leaders had recognized Kosovo’s independence the standards of international law ceased to exist, the Russian diplomats must have second sight – a year had not yet passed when the Russian government ignored those standards. The laws were replaced by precedents and customs. From this standpoint, there are good reasons for Moscow’s campaign in South Ossetia. South Ossetia is de facto a republic, even if no one (including Russia) has recognized it. However, it became Russia’s protectorate. How can we allow somebody to attack it?

Moscow appeals to the common sense and the will of the South Ossetian population. Those who did not share this collective will were driven out of the republic a long time ago (the same holds true for Chechnya). Like Serbia, Georgia makes reference to history. But neither of that is of importance, only the force is all-important.

It goes without saying that the Georgian authorities realized that when they decided to follow Moscow’s example and to hold the operation to restore the constitutional order in the country. They hoped not only that the Georgian army was stronger than the Ossetian one, but also that the USA would support them. It could take two days to capture the capital of South Ossetia Tskhinvali while the Russian authorities consulted with each other and with Washington. This plan had almost been fulfilled, but, as so often is the case, the important decisions were made by the field commanders rather than by the Kremlin officials: while the Russian authorities were consulting with each other, the Russian peacemaking forces, which were deployed in South Ossetia, joined the battle, received the air support and actually turned the Georgian-Ossetian conflict into the Russian-Georgian war.

This time, the Georgian elite (and the Georgian society) were greatly disappointed again. America was not going to protect Georgia. The USA was going to use Georgia to counterbalance Russia, as a supplier of soldiers for the war in Iraq and as a diplomatic ally in the UN. But that does not mean that Georgia could use America as anything.

The right of the strong implies that the strong have no commitments to the weak. To be more exact, those commitments are met when it is in the interest of the strong. For example, Russia has met its formal and informal commitments to South Ossetia. The reason for Russia’s interference in the Georgian-Ossetian conflict is in line with the American propaganda: protection of its citizens.

By the way, it is a mystery how the South Ossetians, who live in Tskhinvali, were given Russian citizenship at a time when many people who have lived and worked in Russia for several years cannot get it. The South Ossetians do not pay the Russian taxes and do not serve in the Russian army. They have no duties, they have only rights. The Russian government is reluctant to take care of many of its citizens living in Russia and to protect their rights.

However, from the formal standpoint, everything is right. Governments must protect their citizens. If the Russian authorities took better care of their citizens in Russia, the words that there is a need to protect “our people” in Tskhinvali would ring more true.

The military do not think about the diplomatic and legal details very much. They simply know that they have the superior firepower that should be used. The Georgian army applied this power to the Ossetians and shelled Tskhinvali. A few days later, Georgia was attacked by the Russian army.

The Russian generals told the curious journalists that the army bombed and fired at only the military installations. They were likely to issue such orders. But they were not concerned about what actually the bombs hit. Surprisingly, even the XXI century “smart” bombs, which are much talked-about, hit residential districts instead of enemy fortifications.

After the Russian generals made another statement that in Georgia only the military installations had been bombed, the destroyed houses of the civilian population in Gori were shown on the Western TV. They looked just like the destroyed houses in Tskhinvali, which were shown on the Russian TV.

Boris Kagarlitsky is Director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements

August 14, 2008



Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

12.08.2008

RFE/RL: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AGREE TO PEACE PLAN TO END FIGHTING

Georgia and Russia have agreed to an EU-sponsored peace plan to end five days of fierce fighting in Georgia that has killed at least several hundred people and left thousands homeless.

02.07.2008

RFE/RL: GUA? MULLING MOLDOVA'S ABSENCE AS SUMMIT BEGINS

Officials from Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova are in the Georgian city of Batumi for the first day of the two-day GUAM summit.

14.04.2008

RFE/RL: NATO: KYIV, TBILISI FACE MORE OBSTACLES THAN SIMPLY RUSSIAN RESISTANCE

Days before the NATO summit in Bucharest began, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili rolled out a new peace initiative for breakaway Abkhazia.

03.04.2008

RFE/RL: NATO WELCOMES CROATIA, ALBANIA, BUT ASKS UKRAINE, GEORGIA, MACEDONIA TO WAIT

Speaking today at NATO's summit in Bucharest, Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said the alliance wants to welcome Ukraine and Georgia as members someday.

19.02.2008

RFE/RL: IN POST-SOVIET BREAKAWAY REGIONS, EYES LOOK LONGINGLY TO KOSOVO

The ink has hardly dried on Kosovo's independence declaration.  And already, reactions are flowing from frozen conflict zones in the former Soviet Union as if on cue.

01.11.2007

RFE/RL: GEORGIA SEEKS END TO RUSSIAN PEACEKEEPERS’ MANDATE IN ABKHAZIA

Georgia says it will move to formally ask Russian peacekeepers to leave the breakaway region of Abkhazia following reports that they seized and beat five Georgian police officers.

22.11.2006

REGNUM: NATO IS MODELING THE SECURITY SYSTEM OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS

The peculiarity of the national security programs of the internationally recognized South Caucasian states is that all of them are being developed in a region that does not yet have a final political map due to a number of unresolved internal conflicts.


Expert forum
THE OUTCOME OF THE EXTRAORDINARY EU SUMMIT ON SOUTH OSSETIAN CONFLICT

VLADIMIR CHIZHOV

03.09.2008

The outcome of the extraordinary EU summit held on September 1 in Brussels was more or less predictable, both in terms of the views expressed by the EU member states and in terms of the EU Presidency conclusion.


RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN CONFLICT. EUROPE SUPPORTS THE U.S. POSITION

ALEKSANDR RAHR

20.08.2008

Yesterday I could say that in Europe there were differences in relation to Russia’s actions in South Ossetia. Some countries blamed Georgia for the conflict, others blamed Russia. But at present there is a different tendency.


THE OUTBREAK OF VIOLATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA IS AT ODDS WITH THE INTERESTS OF ALL THE PARTIES

ANDREY MAKARYCHEV

20.08.2008

South Ossetia and Georgia have been at war with each other since last week. The towns and cities came under fire, the reservists were mobilized. There are the killed and the wounded, and a lot of refugees.


WAR IN SOUTH OSSETIA – TIME TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS STILL REMAINS

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

12.08.2008

The guns are bellowing now in South Ossetia and Georgia, and muses of those who might mull over the solution of the grave crisis, are still silent. Many things including the people’s lives depend on how long the diplomats and policy-makers will be inactive.


SITUATION IN ABKHAZIA

SERGEI BAGAPSH

22.05.2008

What will Abkhazia do, if Georgia joins NATO? Abkhazia will do nothing. Let Georgia join NATO even tomorrow. We do not care about that.


“RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS CAN BECOME MUCH BETTER”

EROSI KITSMARISHVILI

21.05.2008

Currently, there are several negative points in the Russian-Georgian relations. The first one is Georgia’s bid for the NATO membership, the second one is Tbilisi’s conflict with the breakaway territories – Abkhazia and South Ossetia. There are also the problems of the bilateral relations.


RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS AND WAYS TO SETTLE THE GEORGIAN-ABKHAZIAN CONFLICT

TEMUR IAKOBASHVILI

21.05.2008

It is impossible to settle the conflicts, on which I am working, without Russia’s participation, especially today when the situation has become so strained that the so-called "frozen conflicts" have got "unfrozen".


DOES NATO ENLARGEMENT POSE A THREAT TO RUSSIA?

KONSTANTIN ZATULIN, ALEXANDER KONOVALOV, TATYANA PARKHALINA, OLES DONIY, LEONID KOZHARA, IVAN ZAETS, ANDREW KUCHINS

07.04.2008

"Why do the Central and Eastern European countries seek to join NATO? For many of them it is a way to join the EU. Many countries took this as institutionalization of independence from Moscow. For many countries it was a way to return to Europe," Tatyana Parkhalina.


NATO, THE CIS AND RUSSIA AFTER BUCHAREST

STEPHEN BLANK

02.04.2008

In advance of NATO’s Bucharest summit Russia has decided to employ the traditional Soviet tactics of intimidation and blackmail to block NATO’s enlargement.


SHADE OF KOSOVO OVER GEORGIA

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

13.06.2007

The pending recognition of independence of the Serbian province Kosovo by the United Nations and attempts by Russia to apply the “Kosovo precedent” to the conflict zones in the post-Soviet space might reverberate negatively for Georgia.


GEORGIA FILES A SUIT AGAINST RUSSIA WITH THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

30.03.2007

Initially, the Georgian authorities under plausible pretexts had refrained from filing a suit against Russia. The action was brought to the ECHR only four days before the deadline, which indirectly shows that Tbilisi has been intensely examining that issue.


GEORGIA – NATO: PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION

MERAB PACHULIA

09.03.2007

Ambitions of the Georgian authorities to develop cooperation with NATO are largely supported by the population. There is a consensus on the benefits that the country could receive after acquiring membership of the Alliance, though contradictions remain.


GEORGIA’S WAY TO NATO STREAMLINED

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

19.02.2007

Members of the “National Forum” and some other opposition parties fear that Georgia may join NATO without Abkhazia and South Ossetia, thus losing those territories for good.


ABKHAZIA APPEALS TO THE WORLD COMMUNITY FOR RECOGNITION OF ITS INDEPENDENCE

GHIA NODIA

06.12.2006

Abkhazia, an unrecognized republic of Georgia, held December 6 a “national gathering” to express its will to gain independence.


HOW GEORGIAN – RUSSIAN KNOT WILL BE UNTIED?

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

07.11.2006

Now that the Georgian-Russian confrontation is gaining momentum and is approaching the dangerous point, the sides appear to think over in what mode they will continue coexistence.


GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS ON ITS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE CIS

VLADIMIR ZHARIKHIN

04.05.2006

The economic preferences, which some of the CIS countries have due to the Russian authorities’ decision, such as gas delivery at a cut price, etc. have nothing to do with the CIS Charter.  It is a matter of the bilateral relations. 


ABKHAZIA: NEW EASTERN POLICY

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

29.07.2005

The Georgian minister on conflict settlement, Giorgi Khaindrava, called the recent meeting between the leaders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia a "statehood game." While Georgian officials continue to describe political developments in the breakaway republics in this way, Abkhazia is taking a number of very important political steps that may give its cause a boost.


RUSSIAN - GEORGIAN RELATIONS

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

19.06.2005

Russia's relations with Georgia are one of the most cute and problematic aspects of foreign policy in the Caucasus. Previously "fraternal," i.e. former Soviet republic, Georgia has become one of Moscow's most intractable partners in the former Soviet space.



Opinion
ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Jules Evans

27.08.2008

The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.


TRUE COLORS - UKRAINE'S REACTION TO CONFLICT IN SOUTH OSSETIA
John Marone

18.08.2008

By sending troops into Georgia earlier this month, the Kremlin has shown its willingness to use force to check the advance of the West into what it considers Russia's zone of influence. The pretext for the invasion, Georgia's military clampdown on its separatist region of South Ossetia, is irrelevant.


VICIOUS CIRCLE
Boris Kagarlitsky

17.07.2008

The Russian foreign policy boringly runs around in circles: the row with Estonia on the historic past, the squabbles between Moscow and Kyiv over the Crimea and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, the confrontation with Georgia because of its breakaway republics etc. After having made a full circle we are back to square one - another conflict with Georgia.


GEORGIA COULD BE OBSTREPEROUS OVER RUSSIA’S WTO BID
Jules Evans

20.11.2006

The Georgian government has apparently been offering olive branches to the Russian government over the last two weeks, with the demotion of hawkish defence minister Irakli Okruashvili to the ministry of economy (he’s since resigned).



Our authors
  Ivan  Gayvanovych, Kiev

THE EXCHANGE

27 April 2010


Geopolitical influence is an expensive thing. The Soviet Union realized that well supporting the Communist regimes and movements all over the world including Cuba and North Korea. The current Russian authorities also understood that when they agreed that Ukraine would not pay Russia $40 billion for the gas in return for extension of the lease allowing Russia's Black Sea Fleet to be stationed in the Crimea.



  Aleh  Novikau, Minsk

KYRGYZ SYNDROME

20 April 2010


The case of Kurmanbek Bakiyev is consistent with the logic of the Belarusian authorities’ actions towards the plane crash near Smolensk. The decisions not to demonstrate the “Katyn” film and not to announce the mourning were made emotionally, to spite Moscow and Warsaw, without thinking about their consequences and about reaction of the society and the neighbouring countries.



  Akram  Murtazaev, Moscow

EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA

16 April 2010


Explosions take place in Russia again. The last week of March started with terrorist acts at the Moscow metro stations which were followed by blasts in the Dagestani city of Kizlar. The horror spread from the metro to the whole city.



  John  Marone, Kyiv

POOR RELATIONS – THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT GOES TO MOSCOW

29 March 2010


Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych symbolically selected Brussels as his first foreign visit upon taking the oath of office in what can only be seen as an exercise in public relations. The new government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov headed straight for Moscow shortly thereafter with the sole intention of cutting a deal.



  Boris  Kagarlitsky, Moscow

THE WRATH DAY LIKE A GROUNDHOG DAY

25 March 2010


The protest actions, which the Russian extraparliamentary opposition had scheduled for March 20, were held as planned, they surprised or frightened nobody. Just as it had been expected, the activists of many organizations supporting the Wrath Day took to the streets… but saw there only the policemen, journalists and each other.



  Jules  Evans, London

COLD SNAP AFTER SPRING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

17 June 2009


As I write, angry demonstrations continue in Tehran and elsewhere in the Islamic Republic of Iran, over what the young demonstrators perceive as the blatant rigging of the presidential election to keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power for another five years. Reports suggest at least eight protestors have been killed by police.



  Kevin  O'Flynn, Moscow

THE TERRIBLE C-WORD

08 December 2008


The cri… no the word will not be uttered. Now that President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin have finally allowed themselves to belatedly use the word, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to spit it out of these lips. It’s c-this and c-that. If there was C-Span in Russia then it would be c-ing all day and all night long.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation