Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


GALLUP: GEORGIANS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD RUSSIA LESS FRIENDLY SINCE WAR

Print version

More Georgians favor close relations with United States, European Union

The Russia-Georgia war in South Ossetia a year ago may have been a tipping point in recent Georgian and Russian relations, at least from the Georgian public's perspective. A Gallup Poll conducted in Georgia in May finds the percentage of Georgians who say their country has to have good relations with Russia by all means falling below a majority for the first time since Gallup began polling there.

 

Gallup's survey of Georgia finds the percentage of Georgians saying their country has to have good relations with Russia by all means down 17 percentage points to 47% in May 2009 from a pre-war 64% in June 2008. Several Gallup Polls conducted before the five-day war in August 2008, showed roughly 6 in 10 or more Georgians saying this. In tandem with this decrease, there has been an increase in the percentage of Georgians who now say their country needs to have a very principal position regarding Russia -- to 37% from 21%. Another 5% say Georgia needs to terminate all relations with Russia -- up from 1%.

Regardless of these shifts, Georgians are still more likely to favor good relations with Russia at all costs than favor terminating or having Georgia take a principal position regarding Russia. This likely reflects the strength of Georgians' close cultural, historical, and economic ties to Russia.

These ties, as well as the tensions evident in the nationwide survey, surfaced in focus groups Gallup conducted in Georgia in February. "I have many friends in Russia," one Georgian participant said when asked about relations since the conflict. "We preserve our good relationships, but as soon as we start talking about politics, the relationships become strained."

Relatively few citizens in Russia -- a country in a position of power with arguably less to lose economically than Georgia -- place the same importance on good relations that Georgians do. In contrast with their Georgian neighbors, 15% of Russians interviewed in June 2009 say their country has to have good relations with Georgia by all means. A majority of Russians (55%) say Russia has to have a very principal position regarding Georgia, while 10% say Russia has to terminate all relations.

Relations in the Region

As they did before the war, Georgians are still most likely to name Russia as the country that Georgia should have the closest relationship with in the Commonwealth of Independent States region. However, this desire is not what it was. The 32% of Georgians who now say their country should have the closest relationship with Russia represents a decline of 25 points from 57% in June 2008. More Georgians choose Ukraine (13% in 2008 vs. 22% in 2009) and Azerbaijan (5% in 2008 vs. 12% in 2009) than they did before the war.

Relations With the United States and the European Union

As some Georgians lost admiration for Russia after the conflict, relations with the European Union and United States gained in perceived importance. Overall, Georgians' attitudes toward relations with all three players are more mixed than they were before the war. The percentages of Georgians who say it is more important for their country to have a close relationship with either the EU or U.S., even if it might hurt the relationship with Russia, have doubled since the war.

The percentage of Georgians who say it is more important for their country to have a close relationship with the U.S., even if it might hurt their relationship with Russia, is up to 24% in the most recent survey from 11% before the war. Similar percentages of Georgians say it is important for Georgia to have close relations with the U.S. (24%) even if it hurts Russia and with Russia (28%) even if it hurts the U.S.

 

In a change from their pre-war attitudes, Georgians are now slightly more likely to say that it is important for their country to have close relations with the EU (27%) than to say the same about relations with Russia (22%).

About a third of Georgians (34%) volunteer that it is important for Georgia to have close relationships with all three.

Friends Again?

Neither Russians nor Georgians have given up hope that the two nations will someday be able to reconcile -- and give similar estimates as to when they think this will happen. Roughly 4 in 10 Russians (40%) and Georgians (43%) think it will happen in less than 10 years. About 1 in 10 Georgians (10%) and Russians (8%) think the two will never become friendly states again. High percentages in both countries, however, say they don't know.

 

When asked what the future holds for relations between the two countries, a Georgian focus group participant expected history would repeat itself. "First, they [relations] will improve and then worsen again. It is always like that," the participant said. "This is the history of Russian-Georgian relationships for centuries."

Survey Methods

Results are based on face-to-face interviews with approximately 1,000 adults, aged 15 and older, conducted in May 2007, June 2008, and May 2009 in Georgia. South Ossetia and Abkhazia were not included for the safety of the interviewers. The excluded area represents approximately 7% of the population. For results based on the 2007, 2008, and 2009 samples, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3.5 percentage points. Results in Russia are based on face-to-face interviews with approximately 2,000 adults, aged 15 and older, conducted in June 2009. For results based on the 2009 sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points. The margin of error reflects the influence of data weighting. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Focus groups were conducted in Tbilisi in mid-February 2009.

Neli ESIPOVA and Julie RAY, Washington, D.C.

, August 12, 2009




Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

25.08.2009

GALLUP: GEORGIANS FAVOR ONGOING COOPERATION AMONG CIS COUNTRIES

Georgia's withdrawal from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) last Tuesday highlights the uncertainty of the post-Soviet alliance's future.

24.06.2009

RFE/RL: WHAT GEORGIANS REALLY THINK ABOUT RUSSIA

Although Georgia went to war with Russia last year, a new nationwide survey indicates mixed feelings about Russia.

27.05.2009

THE INSTITUTE FOR POLLING & MARKETING: GEORGIA. POLITICAL RATING FOR MAY

Starting from April, 28 till May, 5 IPM has conducted next in turn wave of omnibus survey and used political questions only for estimation of political organization’s ratings.

10.04.2009

RFE/RL: UNREST IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA REFLECTS PRECEDENT SET BY KOSOVO

The streets of Moldova and Georgia are boiling with protest and anger, while Kosovo continues to grapple with its self-proclaimed statehood.

06.04.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: RESETTING RELATIONS. GEORGIA NOT A BARGAINING CHIP

The first face-to-face talks between Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev were expected to shed light on what the notion of the “reset button” for US-Russian relationships promulgated by US Vice-President Joe Biden was really about.

16.02.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: SWEET PROMISES: SAAKASHVILI MAKES NATIONAL ADDRESS

Saakashvili’s address did not have a radical tone this time. Populist rhetoric was also missing. Saakashvili said almost nothing about his vision of how territorial integrity would be restored.

19.01.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: INTERVIEW WITH ARIEL COHEN

The US-Georgia Charter is not a Mutual Defence Pact. But It Draws Red Line for Russia.

12.01.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: UNITED STATES-GEORGIA CHARTER ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

Deepening Georgia’s integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions is a mutual priority, and we plan to undertake a program of enhanced security cooperation intended to increase Georgian capabilities and to strengthen Georgia’s candidacy for NATO membership.


Expert forum
GEORGIA IS WAITING FOR REFORMS

ARCHIL GEGESHIDZE

12.08.2009

If the reforms are conducted, there is a hope that next elections will be free and honest. This is an achievable task for both the authorities and the opposition, as other political goals are in the distant future. Those include NATO membership, integration with the EU, return of the lost territories of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.


THE GEORGIANS DISLIKE THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, BUT HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE

DAVID BERDZENISHVILI

11.08.2009

The Georgian political establishment and the whole society share an opinion that in August 2008 Russia was aggressive and acted improperly. Russia invaded Georgia, which is acknowledged by all the political forces regardless of their status, by the authorities and by the radical and constructive opposition.


GEORGIA ON THE EVE OF THE SOUTH OSSETIA WAR ANNIVERSARY

GIA ZHORZHOLIANI

04.08.2009

The Russian leaders’ words that it is necessary to replace the Georgian authorities strengthen Mikheil Saakashvili’s positions. However I believe that drastic measures will not be taken. Both the authorities and the opposition are willing to act moderately.


TBILISI IS WAITING FOR “HELPING HAND”

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

22.07.2009

I believe that Barack Obama managed to avert another Russia-Georgia war and now Tbilisi is arguing more confidently that Russia’s war threat has been prevented. The question is for how long.  


OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARDS SOUTH CAUCASUS

ALEXANDER ISKANDARYAN

08.07.2009

It is hard for the U.S.A. and other Western countries not to take into account Russia’s interests in the South Caucasus. In case there were any illusions in this respect, the five days war between Russia and Georgia in August 2008 has dispelled them.


NEITHER THE U.S.A., NOR RUSSIA ARE INTERESTED IN THE ESCALATION OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN GEORGIA

DAVID LOSABERIDZE

03.07.2009

The situation in Georgia will be one of the issues of the negotiations between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and U.S. President Barack Obama which will be held on July 6 in Moscow.


THERE ARE NO PRO-RUSSIAN POLITICIANS IN GEORGIA

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

19.05.2009

What does the current situation in Georgia mean for Russia? On the one hand, the confrontation between the government and the opposition is Georgia’s domestic affair. Whoever wins the struggle, no one would take a pro-Russian position.


U.S.A. DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE POST-SOVIET SPACE AS RUSSIA’S INFLUENCE AREA

ALEXANDER RONDELI

07.04.2009

The U.S. will not throw away its allies including Georgia for the sake of "reset" of the relations with Russia.


THE U.S. POLICY TOWARDS THE SOUTH CAUCASUS

ALEXANDER ISKANDARYAN

24.02.2009

There are no new tendencies or changes in the U.S. policy towards the South Caucasus after the new U.S. Administration has been formed. Barack Obama has not worked out his South Caucasian policy yet. For the time being, the new U.S. authorities focus on overcoming the economic crisis.


U.S. – GEORGIA RELATIONS UNDER THE BARACK OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

ALEXANDER RONDELI

26.01.2009

In the eyes of the U.S. Administration Saakashvili represents the guarantor of stability and further development. If Saakashvili slowly but steadily promotes democratization in the country, he has nothing to worry about.


DOES THE US–GEORGIA CHARTER ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP CHALLENGE RUSSIA?

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

14.01.2009

It is difficult to forecast how diligently the Administration of President Barack Obama will follow the above-mentioned articles of the Charter. But there is a high probability (taking into consideration the increased tension in the Russia-U.S. relations) that Russia would consider the Charter as a challenge to its interests in South Caucasus.


GEORGIA IN 2008

ARCHIL GEGESHIDZE

26.12.2008

The year 2008 was the most eventful in the entire history of independent Georgia. It started with the January presidential election: it was held against a background of the mass protest marches in November 2007. 



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation