Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


DOES THE US–GEORGIA CHARTER ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP CHALLENGE RUSSIA?

Print version

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE,
Independent expert, Tbilisi

The Charter on Strategic Partnership between Georgia and the United States, signed during the last days of the Bush Administration, has aroused various reactions, from enthusiastic to cautious optimism in the Georgian political establishment. In the situation, when Russia and Georgia actually found themselves in the “Cold War” conflict, there is no political force in Georgia, which doubts the political significance of the document. Only Georgia’s Labor Party, keeping a bit aloof from the others, has stated that the Charter is the first step to the U.S. military presence in Georgia, the issue which is allegedly being negotiated behind-the-scenes. But the Georgian authorities zealously deny that kind of supposition. 

Indeed, such kind of document could not include the direct indication for the deployment of the U.S. military bases in Georgia.

However, the part of the Charter, which covers the issues of military cooperation between Georgia and U.S.A., contains the items, which make the document different from that one, recently signed between Washington and Kyiv. The United States–Georgia Charterpays much more attention to the military aspect of cooperation. The Charter makes it clear, that the U.S.-Georgia cooperation in military and security spheres will grow stronger, increasing Georgia’s chances for integration into NATO. The point in the Charter which urges Russia to follow the Ceasefire Agreement, dated August 12, 2008, and non-use of force is actually a warning to the Kremlin.

Another point of the Charter covers the development of the existing programs on bilateral cooperation in military and security spheres in order to “eliminate threats to peace and stability”. Under certain conditions, if the sides consider such threats to become real, that point can come into being by reinforcing U.S. military presence in Georgia to a varying extent.

Despite the fact, that the Charter doesn’t provide the United States with the commitment to offer military support to Georgia in case of escalation of an armed conflict against it, it will no doubt be a kind of a red rag for the Kremlin. As according to the Charter, which was successfully negotiated with the new U.S. Administration, Americans will tend to enhance their influence over the Caucasian region. It is proved by the item devoted to “the development of the new Southern Corridor” (in circumvention of Russia)in order to diversify the exports of energy supplies destined for Georgia and EU member states. The project would seriously break down Russia’s economic and geopolitical interests in the region.

The article of the Charter, calling on the measures for the reconciliation between Georgians, Abkhazians and Ossetians can also alert Russia. The locals of Abkhazia and South Ossetia – Georgia’s separatist regions, recognized by Moscow, express growing discontent with Russia’s intrusion into their lands, including the deployment of the Russian military bases and behavior of the Russian militaries.

It is difficult to forecast how diligently the Administration of President Barack Obama will follow the above-mentioned articles of the Charter. But there is a high probability (taking into consideration the increased tension in the Russia-U.S. relations) that Russia would consider the Charter as a challenge to its interests in South Caucasus. In this light, the Charter appears to lead to the further complications in the volatile Russia-Georgia relations. It will probably bolster the Kremlin to destructive actions against Georgia, once more turning the country into the arena of confrontation between the big international players.

Under such conditions the Georgian officials should act very carefully in order not to draw themselves and the country into a new armed conflict with Russia. However, the bitter experience of the August war is a vivid example of impossibility to avoid hostilities when it is already “pre-programmed.”

January 14, 2009




Our readers’ comments



There are no comments on this article.

You will be the first.

Send a comment

Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

19.01.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: INTERVIEW WITH ARIEL COHEN

The US-Georgia Charter is not a Mutual Defence Pact. But It Draws Red Line for Russia.

12.01.2009

THE GEORGIAN TIMES: UNITED STATES-GEORGIA CHARTER ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

Deepening Georgia’s integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions is a mutual priority, and we plan to undertake a program of enhanced security cooperation intended to increase Georgian capabilities and to strengthen Georgia’s candidacy for NATO membership.


Expert forum
“NIKOLOZ GILAURI IS ONE OF THE MOST EXPERIENCED MINISTERS”

GHIA NODIA

06.02.2009

Frequent changes of Prime Ministers are good for the opposition members. They can criticize the authorities more actively, talk about the instability in the country, but they do not care who will be the next Prime Minister.


U.S. – GEORGIA RELATIONS UNDER THE BARACK OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

ALEXANDER RONDELI

26.01.2009

In the eyes of the U.S. Administration Saakashvili represents the guarantor of stability and further development. If Saakashvili slowly but steadily promotes democratization in the country, he has nothing to worry about.


U.S. - RUSSIA RELATIONS UNDER THE NEW U.S. ADMINISTRATION

VIKTOR KREMENIUK

23.01.2009

The rivalry between Moscow and Washington regarding the post-Soviet space will be still urgent under President Obama, but it won’t be crucial as it was under the previous Administration. A certain compromise is possible to achieve.



Author’s opinion on other topics

IS GEORGIA - ARMENIA FRICTION A SOURCE OF A NEW CONFLICT IN THE CAUCASUS?

09 September 2009

Quite chilly relations between Georgia and Armenia did not become warmer even after Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili’s recent visit to Yerevan where he had vainly attempted to solve the long-standing problems in the bilateral relations.


TBILISI IS WAITING FOR “HELPING HAND”

22 July 2009

I believe that Barack Obama managed to avert another Russia-Georgia war and now Tbilisi is arguing more confidently that Russia’s war threat has been prevented. The question is for how long.  


GEORGIAN OPPOSITION AND GOVERNMENT MAKE A PAUSE

08 June 2009

After May 26 (Georgia’s Independence Day), when an impressively large-scale rally organized by the opposition had shown that too many people in Georgia sought to make Mikheil Saakashvili and his team resign, the opposition and the ruling party decided to weaken their confrontation and to step back from the “Red Line”.


PROTEST ACTIONS IN GEORGIA ARE COMING TO A HEAD

20 April 2009

How long the opposition’s rally in Tbilisi will last and how long can it maintain the protest mood? Many have asked this question since the seventh day of the protest rally when it became clear that the opposition had failed to take to the streets the number of protesters, which would be a weighty argument for the authorities to effect changes.


GEORGIA: GOVERNMENT, OPPOSITION AND EXTERNAL PLAYERS

23 March 2009

The external players, which have their own plans and interests in Georgia and the Caucasus region, have become increasingly involved in monitoring of the internal developments in the country along with raising Georgia’s political temperature.


GEORGIAN OPPOSITION IS PREPARING FOR SPRING PROTESTS

04 March 2009

Having announced the date for the protest action beginning, the opposition does not tell the people what will happen in the country, even if they manage to oust Saakashvili.


FIVE YEARS AFTER THE ROSE REVOLUTION

01 December 2008

For the first time, Georgia has not celebrated the anniversary of the Rose Revolution in a traditional pompous way and the authorities have not boasted about their successes as they had done annually on 23 November since 2003.


WAR IN SOUTH OSSETIA – TIME TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS STILL REMAINS

12 August 2008

The guns are bellowing now in South Ossetia and Georgia, and muses of those who might mull over the solution of the grave crisis, are still silent. Many things including the people’s lives depend on how long the diplomats and policy-makers will be inactive.


BURJANADZE RETURNS?!

11 July 2008

Ex-chairwoman of the Georgian Parliament Nino Burjanadze who had scandalously quitted President Mikheil Saakashvili’s team right before the May 21, 2008 parliamentary elections, returned to politics the very way that was most expected from her cautious and pragmatic mind.


THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS

25 April 2008

Almost all significant political forces in Georgia, including the ruling party, say that there are sufficient reasons for making the compromises with Russia that would not infringe upon Georgia’s national interests.


“BORIS BEREZOVSKY’S HAND” IN GEORGIAN POLITICS

26 March 2008

The other day Berezovsky clarified the hints which he had dropped about his moral responsibility and his wish to continue Patarkatsishvili’s work.


STAINED “NEW LEAF” IN THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS

31 January 2008

Mikheil Saakashvili once again extends hand of friendship to Russia and proposes to “turn over a new leaf” in bilateral relations.


FOR HOW LONG WILL THEY HIDE THE CAT IN A BAG?

24 December 2007

Mikheil Saakashvili who is seeking re-election to the second term in office as President of Georgia must be very lucky. The resolution of the issue concerning recognition of Kosovo’s independence by the West, which was due on December 10, has been postponed, even if not for long.


IS THE “BEACON OF LIBERTY” DYING OUT?

06 December 2007

The “Beacon of Liberty”, that, to believe U.S. President George Bush, Georgia embodied in May 2005, when he made a visit  to the country, is dying out, even though the West does not want to believe that and continues to give Saakashvili and his government a helping hand.


IS GEORGIA ON THE BRINK OF A NEW CIVIL CONFRONTATION?

16 October 2007

Barely had the Saakashvili’s team got rid of Okruashvili, when a much stronger opponent, oligarch Badri Patarkatsishvili, who is expected to become leader of the united opposition, came up as a new opponent to Saakashvili.  


THE OKRUASHVILI FACTOR

08 October 2007

Irakli Okruashvili may use his arrest as the political dividend that he lacked until recently. Now he is unlikely to be reproached for the implicit connections with the authorities, as it was often done in recent times.


THE FORTHCOMING ELECTIONS IN GEORGIA: SOCIAL ATTITUDES

01 August 2007

The presidential and parliamentary elections in Georgia will take place in a year and a half. However, the voters’ attitudes and opinions about the policy pursued in the country are already in the process of shaping.


THE “SANAKOEV” OPERATION

03 July 2007

The Georgian authorities did their utmost to convince the Europeans in Brussels that Dmitry Sanakoev was not Tbilisi’s puppet, but a representative of the Ossetian population in Georgia including the breakaway region.


SHADE OF KOSOVO OVER GEORGIA

13 June 2007

The pending recognition of independence of the Serbian province Kosovo by the United Nations and attempts by Russia to apply the “Kosovo precedent” to the conflict zones in the post-Soviet space might reverberate negatively for Georgia.


NEW POLITICAL CULTURE IN GEORGIA – PHILOSOPHY OF “WASHING AWAY”

25 May 2007

The current events in Georgia clearly indicate that after the Rose Revolution a new political culture is being aggressively planted in the country. Apart from other goals, it is most likely aimed at a complete replacement of the national Georgian traditions and values with the new philosophy.


GEORGIA FILES A SUIT AGAINST RUSSIA WITH THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

30 March 2007

Initially, the Georgian authorities under plausible pretexts had refrained from filing a suit against Russia. The action was brought to the ECHR only four days before the deadline, which indirectly shows that Tbilisi has been intensely examining that issue.


GEORGIA’S WAY TO NATO STREAMLINED

19 February 2007

Members of the “National Forum” and some other opposition parties fear that Georgia may join NATO without Abkhazia and South Ossetia, thus losing those territories for good.


ILHAM ALIYEV’S VISIT TO TBILISI AND RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS

14 February 2007

Tbilisi and Baku managed to overcome the worsening of their relations in 2005 connected with the possibility of spread of the “Orange-Rose Revolution” to Azerbaijan.


TBILISI WILL RESORT TO A TRICK IN ITS RELATIONS WITH MOSCOW

09 February 2007

Last week Russia and Georgia’s presidents Vladimir Putin and Mikheil Saakashvili almost simultaneously confirmed their aspiration to improve the volatile Russian-Georgian relations.


MOSCOW HAS TAKEN A STEP TOWARDS TBILISI… WHAT COMES NEXT?!

26 January 2007

Russia has overestimated the effect of its sanctions against Georgia. It seems that the Kremlin officials have finally counted and compared their losses and gains from the sanctions against Georgia and ruled out that they better to loosen the grip.


WILL GEORGIA ADOPT A NEW CONSTITUTION?

17 January 2007

While signing the constitutional amendments on January 10, Saakashvili made no secret of the fact that they were introduced to “please friends and disappoint enemies”, and immediately he suggested working on a new Constitution.


GEORGIA IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL ELECTIONS

13 December 2006

The relationship between Russia and Georgia which has been marked by tension and confrontations bears influence on Georgia’s political landscape and forthcoming national elections.


MOSCOW HAS NO MORE CREDENCE TO TBILISI

28 November 2006

Tbilisi intends to show Moscow and the whole international community that the Saakashvili Administration is eager to restart the two countries’ dialogue.


IRAKLI OKRUASHVILI PROVES THAT ONE’S AS GOOD AS NONE IN POLITICS

15 November 2006

The smooth neutralization of the ambitious and aggressive Okruashvili has dispelled the halo of power surrounding him.


HOW GEORGIAN – RUSSIAN KNOT WILL BE UNTIED?

07 November 2006

Now that the Georgian-Russian confrontation is gaining momentum and is approaching the dangerous point, the sides appear to think over in what mode they will continue coexistence.

 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation