Main page                           
Eurasian Home - analytical resource


RFE/RL: FIVE YEARS AFTER THE ROSE REVOLUTION, A FUNCTIONING STATE

Print version

Have you ever been happy after paying a fine?

I have. It was back in 2005 and I had illegally parked my car in Tbilisi. A police officer approached and told me I would have to pay a fine for the infraction. I then did what came naturally for someone raised in the Soviet Union -- I instinctively offered to pay a bribe.

But to my surprise -- and ultimate delight -- the police officer refused, saying I would have to pay the full fine and that he would even give me a receipt. It would be all legal and above board. In the end, I was happy to part with my 40 Lari (about $30), especially when I contemplated what I was getting in return -- a functioning state, which is something Georgia hadn't had for centuries.

Most importantly, I felt like a real citizen.

As Georgia marks the fifth anniversary of the Rose Revolution the mood is somber and the celebrations of past years are conspicuously absent. This is understandable. The revolution has lost a lot of its luster and Georgians are in a funk. But it is important to remember, despite the disillusionment of the moment, what we have gained and how far we have come.

Breaking Moscow's Grip

To understand what I mean, we have to look back at the pre-Rose Revolution era, when Georgia hardly deserved to be even called a state.

The country was run by the corrupt regime of Eduard Shevardnadze. There was no effective governmental system, no working institutions, and no functional economy. Cronyism dominated, public services were decrepit, public servants were incompetent, and criminality flourished.

As a result of this weakness, Russia -- whose post-Soviet leaders never gave up the ambition to dominate Tbilisi both politically and economically -- was able to strengthen its grip over its small southern neighbor. State-controlled energy giants like Gazprom, for example, were buying up Georgia's energy sector. In their desire to stay in power at any cost, Shevardnadze and his clan were prepared to make further concessions to Russia and let Moscow establish strategic control over Georgia.

From this perspective, the events of November 2003 marked a giant leap for Georgia, not just from its Soviet past but also from Russia's post-Soviet grip.

It is therefore not surprising that the Kremlin has used every tool at its disposal to undermine President Mikheil Saakashvili’s rule almost from the moment he came to office. In the immediate aftermath of the Rose Revolution, for example, Moscow hosted a gathering of leaders of Georgia’s two breakaway regions - Abkhazia and South Ossetia - something that can hardly be described as a friendly gesture.

Yet despite Moscow’s continuing efforts to destabilize Tbilisi -- by manipulating energy supplies, banning Georgian imports from Russia, and cutting all transport links between the two countries -- Georgia has managed some meaningful reforms. Corruption has been significantly reined in, a new domestic infrastructure has been built, public services have been overhauled, and the police have been completely reformed.

A Work In Progress

This does not mean I am happy with everything Saakashvili’s government has done. Not even close.

I certainly don’t share U.S. President George W. Bush’s laughably inaccurate characterization of Georgia as "beacon of democracy". There is not a single nationwide TV channel in the country, which is not directly or indirectly controlled by the state. The judiciary is far from independent. The legislative branch is nothing but an obedient executor of the will of the government. The governing style of the president and his closest aides can be best characterized by the formula "we know best, so don't interfere."

All that needs to change if the democratic development in the country is to become as irreversible as its drive away from Russia's grip and toward the West.

While preparing to cover the fifth anniversary of the Rose Revolution, RFE/RL's Georgian Service asked some 50 citizens across the country a simple question: Is Georgia a better place today than it used to be five years ago?

Not surprisingly, the answers ranged from "much better" to "far worse." Can you expect a 45-year old man who lost his job after the Revolution to be happy with the change? Probably not. Not to mention tens of thousands of displaced people, who have been driven out from their homes by the five-day war with Russia this summer.

But one respondent from a small town in the western province of Imereti -- where regular water, electricity, and fuel shortages were once the norm -- best reflected my feelings on the changes. Now, not only are those shortages a thing of the past, he told us, but the area also has a network of roads connecting its villages and towns with each other and with the provincial capital Kutaisi.

This man now sees the benefits of a functioning state and feels like a citizen, just like I did when I paid my parking ticket.

Are we better off than five years ago? My answer is a clear yes. But we still have a lot more work to do.

David KAKABADZE 




Other materials on this topic
Hot topics
Digest

11.11.2008

RFE/RL: WITH OBAMA WIN, NATO PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE, GEORGIA APPEAR TO SHIFT

Barack Obama's election may have prompted celebrations from Chicago to Nairobi. But in Tbilisi, it was disappointment that carried the day, with many Georgians ruefully contemplating what John McCain's defeat would mean for them.

12.08.2008

RFE/RL: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AGREE TO PEACE PLAN TO END FIGHTING

Georgia and Russia have agreed to an EU-sponsored peace plan to end five days of fierce fighting in Georgia that has killed at least several hundred people and left thousands homeless.


Expert forum
FIVE YEARS AFTER THE ROSE REVOLUTION

ZAAL ANJAPARIDZE

01.12.2008

For the first time, Georgia has not celebrated the anniversary of the Rose Revolution in a traditional pompous way and the authorities have not boasted about their successes as they had done annually on 23 November since 2003.


FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ROSE REVOLUTION

SERGEI MARKEDONOV

25.11.2008

The main reason why the fifth anniversary of the Rose Revolution is not celebrated with a great pomp is that the Georgians are bitterly disappointed with the results of the revolution. In fact, nobody was going to carry out democratic reforms, although the ‘revolutionaries’ had set themselves this goal.


GEORGIAN OPPOSITION FACES NEW CHALLENGES

MERAB PACHULIA

19.11.2008

Over the past 10 months, most of opposition leaders have not enjoyed public support because they failed to solve important political issues and fell short of expectations of those who were strongly opposed to the government.


DISMISSAL OF GEORGIAN PRIME MINISTER VLADIMIR GURGENIDZE

DAVID APRASIDZE

29.10.2008

I believe that Georgia's Prime Minister Vladimir Gurgenidze was dismissed over both the Russia-Georgia armed conflict and the internal political situation. The August conflict in South Ossetia made it clear that the policy, pursued by the Georgian government must be changed and some reshuffles were necessary.  


THE OUTCOME OF THE EXTRAORDINARY EU SUMMIT ON SOUTH OSSETIAN CONFLICT

VLADIMIR CHIZHOV

03.09.2008

The outcome of the extraordinary EU summit held on September 1 in Brussels was more or less predictable, both in terms of the views expressed by the EU member states and in terms of the EU Presidency conclusion.


CONSEQUENCES OF THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFRONTATION

DAVID BERDZENISHVILI

29.08.2008

Russia’s decision to recognize the independence of Georgia's breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia has been made not only by the Russian President and the Russian political establishment, but also, regrettably, by the majority of the Russian citizens. Few people in Russia criticized their authorities.


THE REASONS FOR THE GEORGIAN OPERATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA

ROVSHAN IBRAHIMOV

26.08.2008

When holding the military operation in South Ossetia the Georgian government tried to solve the problem of territorial integrity. If the military operation in South Ossetia had been successful, Saakashvili would have again recieved wide support from the Georgian population and his country could have been integrated into the Western community. 


MOSCOW’S REALITIES AND THE FUTURE OF GEORGIAN SOVEREIGNTY

GEORGETA POURCHOT

20.08.2008

The current Russian military operation in Georgia marks the beginning of the end for Georgian sovereignty. The peace deal brokered by France contains the seeds of further chipping away at Georgian territory.



Opinion
ENOUGH GRAND-STANDING BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Jules Evans

27.08.2008

The typical criticism of the UK’s Foreign Office is the one eloquently expressed in John Le Carre’s The Constant Gardener - that they are pitiless practitioners of real-politik who care more about stability than idealism, and who only really work to protect the interests of British corporations, rather than British values. But on Russia, the Foreign Office seems to have erred on the other side.


BAD HABITS ARE CONTAGIOUS
Boris Kagarlitsky

14.08.2008

Georgia has resolutely condemned Russia’s actions in Chechnya. Russia has severely criticized NATO actions towards Serbia. Later on the Georgian authorities tried to do the same thing in South Ossetia as the Russian authorities had done in Chechnya. Moscow decided to treat Georgia in the same way as NATO had treated Serbia.


VICIOUS CIRCLE
Boris Kagarlitsky

17.07.2008

The Russian foreign policy boringly runs around in circles: the row with Estonia on the historic past, the squabbles between Moscow and Kyiv over the Crimea and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, the confrontation with Georgia because of its breakaway republics etc. After having made a full circle we are back to square one - another conflict with Georgia.



 events
 news
 opinion
 expert forum
 digest
 hot topics
 analysis
 databases
 about us
 the Eurasia Heritage Foundation projects
 links
 our authors
Eurasia Heritage Foundation